Search results

God gave His perfect word by a miracle of direct inspiration to the prophets and apostles. That process of the giving all Scripture by inspiration of God to the prophets and apostles ended with the completion of the New Testament. God did not promise that post-NT translating would be by a...

The rendering "whom he" was not first introduced by a printer at Oxford. It was found in 1613 and 1616 London KJV editions by the king's printer, and it was also in the standard 1629 Cambridge edition and in the standard 1638 Cambridge edition. It is likely from those two standard Cambridge...

Your uninformed or misinformed opinion does not prove it to be right.

The claimed Greek support was actually a later printed Greek text that had reprinted the text of Erasmus. That is not independent evidence since it was merely a reprinting of the text Erasmus translated from an edition of the Latin Vulgate.

Your human opinion is not scripture. The KJV is not right because you say so. You are advocating human KJV-only opinions that are not taught in Scripture. According to the Scriptures, it can be concluded that sound true faith would not come from believing or following opinions...

KJB1611reader, you seem to trust blindly one-sided, biased sources that ignore and dismiss some of the facts including statements made by Erasmus himself. John Nordstrom maintained that Erasmus acknowledged in his annotations that he had translated the last six verses of Revelation 22 from...

John Nordstrom maintained that Erasmus acknowledged in his annotations that he had translated the last six verses of Revelation 22 from the Latin Vulgate, but that the printer did not choose to print that note in the printed edition. John Nordstrom asserted: “This omission can be verified by...

You are not getting anywhere because you have been misinformed and you choose to dismiss and reject the truth. You were and are wrong about Erasmus' Greek text. The truth does matter even though you try to suggest that it does not.

Your incorrect accusation is not true. You refuse to deal with the actual truth. You in effect accuse Erasmus himself of lying when he himself acknowledged translating from Latin into Greek a few times. KJV defender Edward F. Hills listed several renderings in the KJV that Erasmus added to...

You make a false accusation. I did not claim that Erasmus did not make use of some Greek NT manuscripts. My true point is that he added some readings from the Latin Vulgate, and Erasmus himself acknowledged that fact. You demonstrate that you are misinformed or uninformed. John David...

The translators of the 1560 Geneva Bible gave an English rendering for the Hebrew noun "saron" while the KJV translators transliterated it, making it a proper noun.

The Oxford KJV text in the 1917 Scofield Reference Bible is not identical to the KJV text in the 1769 Oxford edition. The 1769 Oxford edition is said to have had over 100 errors that would be corrected in later Oxford KJV editions in the 1800's. One of those errors was not corrected until the...

Host and army seem to have been used as interchangeable synonyms in the pre-1611 English Bibles and the 1611 KJV. At 1 Samuel 28:1, the KJV substituted "armies" where Coverdale's, Matthew's, Great, and Bishops’ Bibles have "host." Again the KJV replaced “host” in some of the earlier English...

You are misinformed and uninformed if you assume that there were no additions and no omissions in the Greek New Testament manuscript copies that were used in the making of the varying printed Textus Receptus editions. Erasmus added some readings from an edition of Jerome's Latin Vulgate that...