Search results

Are you in effect condemning what the KJV itself teaches at Ezekiel 45:21 and Luke 22:1? "The days of unleavened bread" mentioned in Acts 12:3 refers to the days of the seven-day feast of unleavened bread, which can be called the Passover according to Ezekiel 45:21 and Luke 22:1.

Your inconsistent, human, non-scriptural KJV-only opinions have been proven wrong. You choose to cling to your disproven claim even when proven wrong by the KJV itself at Ezekiel 45:21 and Luke 22:1. The KJV itself does not teach what you suggest since Ezekiel 45:21 and Luke 22:1 contradict...

Incorrect according to Ezekiel 45:21 and Luke 22:1. All seven days of the feast of unleavened bread called the Passover was not over at Acts 12:4. You avoid dealing with what the KJV itself teaches at Ezekiel 45:21 and Luke 22:1. Those two verses in the KJV contradict your assertion. You...

Your opinion was demonstrated to be incorrect by the KJV itself. You indicate that you close your eyes to what it is clearly stated in the KJV itself. In Ezekiel 45:21, the KJV itself refers to "the passover, a feast of seven days," proving that the term for the one day Jewish Passover was also...

One sound reason that the modern case for a KJV-only view can be regarded to be flawed and even broken is KJV-only reasoning’s dependence upon use of fallacies. The chain of arguments for a KJV-only view can be no stronger than its weakest links. Some premises that underlie KJV-only conclusions...

The 1611 KJV is not what God directly gave by a miracle of inspiration of God to the prophets and apostles.

You ignore, avoid, or dismiss what the KJV itself teaches. At Ezekiel 45:17, the KJV acknowledged that the term or name "Passover" can be used for the seven day feast of unleavened bread. At Luke 22:1, the KJV teaches that the feast of unleavened bread is called the Passover. Luke could use...

Norris, Rick. Could the 1611 KJV Have Been Better—Not Just the Printers’ Fault? Statesville: Unbound Scriptures Publications, 2006. Norris, Rick. Facts from 400 Years of KJV Editions. Fifteenth Edition. Statesville, NC, 2010, 2017, 2025. Norris, Rick. KJV-only Myths about Archaic Words...

You do not demonstrate that the Andreas text is a trustworthy Byzantine Greek NT text. One scholar associated the Andreas text with the corrupt Western family of texts. Isbon Beckwith wrote: “Cursive no. 1, of the 12th or 13th century containing the Apocalypse, with the commentary of Andreas...

Perhaps you are blindly trusting the one-sided, biased research of a possible heretic. How do you know whether Steven Avery is a true believer? Steven Avery denies and rejects the Bible doctrine of the Trinity, holding some kind of hidden, non-orthodox "oneness" view. Steven Avery claims that...

Your blind belief in human opinions does not make them become true. There are inconsistencies and imperfections in the human claimed PCE. God has not declared the so-called PCE to be absolutely pure and perfect.

From the Greek text of Erasmus after Erasmus introduced the reading "book" into his text from Jerome's Latin Vulgate.

In other words, you are admitting that God has not chosen to keep editions of the KJV from having errors. Errors can still be found in the many varying editions of the KJV today.

The imperfect Latin Vulgate by Jerome got "book" as either a copying error or a translation error. It is inconsistent and wrong to use the imperfect Jerome's Latin Vulgate to make changes to the preserved Greek New Testament text.

You did not answer the questions that you were asked. You fail to back up and prove your human KJV-only opinions to be true and scriptural.

Are you admitting that KJV editions for 200 years [from 1638 until 1838] were wrong? If KJV editions were wrong for 200 years according to your assertion, you make no positive, clear, sound, coherent, convincing, true, and scriptural case for suggesting that they should be blindly accepted as...

Does your human opinion establish your claims as being right or correct? Are you suggesting that you are the authority concerning the word of God in English? Do you ignore the clear parallel between the three of 1 Corinthians 13:13 [faith, hope, and love] to the same three in Hebrews 10:22-24...

Concerning Hebrews 10:12, KJV-only author David Daniels asserted: “So the King James rightly said Jesus’ one sacrifice for sins was forever. The Geneva instead says that Jesus offered one sacrifice for sins, then set down forever. But anyone can see this is false, when we compare it to Stephen’s...

You blindly trust Will Kinney's biased, misinformed KJV-only opinions. The Greek at Hebrews 10:23 was not corrupted. Do you ignore the parallel between the three of 1 Corinthians 13:13 [faith, hope, and love] to the same three in Hebrews 10:22-24 [faith, v. 22; hope, v. 23; love, v. 24]? In...

You have in effect made human KJV-only opinions your final authority since you do not demonstrate from the Scriptures themselves that they teach those opinions. You have at times rejected the stating of the truth. Would God give a spirit of fear of the truth (2 Timothy 1:7)?