Search results

The preserved words given by inspiration of God to the prophets and apostles remain the standard and authority for the making and trying of all Bible translations including the KJV.

KJV-only advocates can be deceived, and many of them are as they choose to believe claims for the KJV that are not true and since they may choose to believe misleading and non-true accusations against other English Bibles that are based on use of divers measures [double standards]. Several...

Made by Nick Sayers in Australia, "The King James Version 2023 Edition New Testament is a modernized rendition of the original King James Version in contemporary English while preserving the timeless meaning of the traditional text." KJV-only advocates do not seem to accept it.

Concerning Revelation 22:19 in his commentary on the book of Revelation, Peter Ruckman wrote: “All the new translations say ‘tree of life’ instead of ‘book of life.’ Again, the change is uncalled for, the Receptus reads ‘bibliou.’ “Tree of life’ is sheer conjecture. No alternate reading is given...

How do KJV-only advocates rationalize or excuse in their minds the improper, bogus, non-true attempt to associate the word of God in present standard English in the NKJV with the New World Translation of Jehovah's Witnesses? Is this use of the guilt-by-association fallacy?

All post-NT Bible translations including the KJV would be non-inspired since they are not made by a miracle of direct inspiration of God. The process of the giving of all Scripture by inspiration of God to the prophets and apostles ended with the completion of the New Testament.

Mark Ward observed that reading-level “tools measure a word’s complexity by syllable count, but that’s not a reliable way of judging whether a word can be understood” (Authorized, p. 54). Mark Ward also noted: “Reading-level analyses run by computers do not yield reliable or useful results when...

James Frye fails to prove his opinion to be true. The KJV is not the only Bible available today that comes from the Textus Receptus. English Bible translations such as the 1833 Webster’s Bible, the 1842 revision of the KJV by Baptists, the 1982 NKJV, the 1990 Modern King James Version, the...

This person's memory of an event over 20 years earlier is unreliable since he admits it is not "word for word correct" He is a biased KJV-only author with an axe to grind against the NKJV. Having read and studied the KJV over 50 years as a believer, my bias is in favor of the KJV.

Perhaps you described your own incorrect attitude towards the NKJV as you throw the baby out with the bathwater and dismiss the NKJV, as if it were The Reader's Digest version, but you did not describe my view of the KJV. You continue your improper use of the guilty-by-association fallacy...

This is another case of a misleading, unproven KJV-only accusations based on use of double standards. This person is repeating D. A. Waite's incorrect and unjust accusation and claim of 2,000 dynamic equivalent renderings. D. A. Waite claimed that the NKJV rendering "Rock" at Habakkuk 1:12...

How do KJV-only advocates rationalize or excuse in their minds the improper, bogus attempt to associate the word of God in present standard English in the NKJV with the New World Translation of Jehovah's Witnesses? That attempt is wrong and unscriptural.

This misleading diversion concerning Acts 3:26 is not the subject of this thread concerning Isaiah 14:12. Your post seems to depend upon the unsound use of fallacies such as the fallacy of guilt by association and upon use of divers measures [an abomination to the LORD (Proverbs 20:10)]. The...

This diversion concerning 1 Corinthians 1:18 is not the subject of this thread concerning Isaiah 14:12. Your post seems to depend upon the unsound use of fallacies such as the fallacy of guilt by association and upon use of divers measures [an abomination to the LORD (Proverbs 20:10)]. The...

At Deuteronomy 14:5, the KJV has a rendering based on either the Greek Septuagint or Jerome's Latin Vulgate. [Hebrew, dishon; Greek LXX, pygargos; Latin Vulgate, pygargus] pygarg (KJV) Did the KJV’s rendering “pygarg” (Deut. 14:5) come from a Hebrew-Latin lexicon which had the rendering of the...

Modern non-scriptural KJV-only teaching adds to the word of God or by eisegesis reads into verses KJV-only opinions that they do not teach. Matthew Verschuur is a Pentecostal KJV-only preacher who is behind KJV-only claims for a claimed Pure Cambridge Edition of the KJV. He connects...

You seem to be confused. Jack Hyles' new KJV-only view is evident in his 1993 book entitled Enemies of Soul Winning with its fifth chapter being entitled "False Bibles--an Enemy of Soul Winning". This 1993 book was published over 10 years after John R. Rice's death. That 1993 book is not the...

I did not claim that God lost it. Perhaps your own KJV-only reasoning/teaching seems to suggest that God failed to preserve the same exact original-language words of Scripture He gave by inspiration to the prophets and apostles well enough for them to remain the standard and greater authority...

That assertion is not true. You bear false witness. I believe that all Scripture given by inspiration of God to the prophets and apostles is 100% absolutely pure and perfect. The KJV was not given by a direct miracle of inspiration of God as proven by the actual proven errors in the 1611...

You fail to prove your opinion to be true. The over 2,000 changes, revisions, and corrections made to the 1611 edition of the KJV involved more than just correction of printer errors.