Search results

I pointed out the truth that the KJV has more episcopal bias than the Bishops' Bible has, and one place that the KJV has more episcopal bias is at Acts 14:23. That is not contradicting myself.

The 1568 Bishops' Bible was the second official authorized version of the Church of England. Its translators were Church of England bishops. KJV-only author Doug Stauffer acknowledged that the ministers of the Church of England in 1600 “incorporated an unscriptural Episcopal form of church...

I did not claim that the NKJV is a KJB, but I accurately acknowledge the truth that the NKJV is a revision of the KJV.

You reveal your inconsistency. KJV-only advocates use different measures/standards in their evaluations of the NKJV than they use in their evaluations of the KJV. KJV-only advocates fail to apply the same exact measures/standards to the process of the making of the KJV that they...

For the Old Testament, the Hebrew Masoretic texts.

The KJV also has "it" at 1 John 1:2, and the pronoun "it" refers back to the noun "life", not directly back to a proper noun Jesus.

The use of "by election" at Acts 14:23 had nothing to do with what you may consider to be the Calvinist doctrine of election. Election at Acts 14:23 was indicating raising the hands or voting. The text of the Latin N. T. translation by Erasmus has “cum suffragns” at Acts 14:23. In the...

The Puritans were still part of the state Church of England. The Puritans wanted to purify it or remove some doctrines and practices that the Church of England had kept from its mother church--the Roman Catholic Church.

Baptists could use the Baptist Bible. In 1842, Baptists and other believers made a revision of the KJV. It had the title The Holy Bible; being the English Version of the Old and New Testaments, made by order of King James I, carefully revised and amended, by several Biblical scholars. In...

One place where the 1611 KJV indicates bias for Episcopal church government is in Acts 14:23 where either the KJV translators, Richard Bancroft, Thomas Bilson, or another prelate omitted the words "by election" found in Tyndale's New Testament, Coverdale's Bible, Matthew's Bible, Great Bible...

Some of the English renderings of the 1611 KJV favor Anglican episcopal church government views more than the pre-1611 English Bibles do. In the early 1600's, some believers complained of episcopal bias in the 1611 KJV. Henry Dexter maintained that “its [KJV’s] translators acted under...

My statements are accurate and true, and they are in agreement with the actual historical facts. Your opinion is incorrect, and it is contrary to the actual historical facts.

I did not refer to the original autographs. I clearly referred to the existing preserved Scriptures in the original languages.

The Lord Jesus Christ [God the Son] is my final authority since He has all power or authority (Matthew 28:18). The preserved Scriptures in the original languages are the proper standard and greater authority for the making and trying of all Bible translations.

The KJV is an official Church of England or Anglican Bible translation. The 1611 KJV was the third authorized version of the state Church of England. It was made under the supervision of a Church of England archbishop--Richard Bancroft and with the rules approved by the head of the state...

Really? Did your final authority exist before 1611? How can the 1611 edition of the KJV be a final authority when it has been changed, revised, and corrected in over 2,000 places?

The KJV translators may have left uncorrected the error of the name of the wrong group of people “Amorites” (1 Kings 11:5) that is in the 1602 edition of the Bishops’ Bible, which could make them responsible for this error of fact being found in the 1611. At 2 Kings 24:19, the 1611 edition has...

That is your human opinion. You seem to be saying that the KJV was not perfect for its first 300 years. There are inconsistencies and imperfections in the claimed PCE. The PCE does not have perfect present English spelling of all its English words. In some places, a KJV edition other than...

In the 1611 edition of the KJV on the same page with the table that gives the order how the Psalms are to be read, there is also this heading: “The order how the rest of holy Scripture (beside the Psalter) is appointed to be read.“ On the next pages of the 1611 that lists the lessons from the...

This high regard is also clearly evident in the views of Church of England Archbishop John Whitgift (1530-1604). Thomas Smith cited Archbishop Whitgift as stating at a public conference at Lambeth with Walter Travers and Thomas Sparks in December of 1583 the following: "The books called...