Search results

When you want to actually discuss scripture , we could do that. Not your foolish charges.

No, I never said quoting God's word is foolishness so let's be a bit more honest when we post. Quoting scripture is always good, but Your ideas about it are quite foolish. You never explain anything you quote. Then you try and claim you go by what is written , but deny thatEzra sought to give...

Tom Nettles contends that the emphasis on public invitations is a result of pragmatism, rooted in the so-called “new measures” of the Second Great Awakening. He argues that the practice represents a departure from the earlier understanding that the entire sermon was intended to press the claims...

Longtime Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary church historian William Estep penned a widely read article for the Baptist Standard that was arguably the most controversial anti-Calvinism article of the 1990s. Estep claims that historic Calvinism, when logically followed, is antithetical...

“Southern Baptist Calvinism: Setting the Record Straight” By Nathan A. Finn He writes, Here are more enemies; This myth continues to be promulgated into the twenty-first century. In a 2000 article in the Baptist Standard, evangelist Freddie Gage is quoted as claiming “There is not a nickels...

You post but do not explain anything you post. Looks doubtful , you might have glanced at it, without even grasping it, is more likely Also in doubt, but you can try to claim it, but your posts betray your statements That is where you are off track. You post but lack comprehension. No one on...

It is taught in several places; 2tim1: 9 Who hath saved us, and called us with an holy calling, not according to our works, but according to his own purpose and grace, which was given us in Christ Jesus before the world began, 10 But is now made manifest by the appearing of our Saviour Jesus...

This seems to be the viewpoint of the natural man and not accurate at all.

That would be true, If Calvinism was wrong. No wrong... God would have decreed to leave them dead in Adam, which leads to the resistance of the natural man. Not all men are children of God. people have to be adopted and granted new birth to be God's children. you need to study adoption Yes...

No... you have never studied it enough so far...I am speaking about people who say...I used to be a Calvinist, or I used to be a Christian. 2 tim4: 2 Timothy 4:10 For Demas hath forsaken me, having loved this present world, and is departed unto Thessalonica; Crescens to Galatia, Titus unto Dalmatia.

You will give account of yourself unto God, as I will. I am okay with it. rom14:12 So then every one of us shall give account of himself to God.

This is why you lack understanding. Several have presented truth to you, You do not want to learn, so stay ignorant of Divine truth. You do not know what you are looking at.

2 Corinthians 11:26 In journeyings often, in perils of waters, in perils of robbers, in perils by mine own countrymen, in perils by the heathen, in perils in the city, in perils in the wilderness, in perils in the sea, in perils among false brethren; Paul lists many dangers he faced, many...

Hey Sh, every biblical Cal on hair has handled your posts without much effort. You can keep trying, but the truth will stand, no matter how you misunderstand it.

Well said! This is a great comfort for real believers.

I know what you looked up, yes.....But have you not seen that in the people it is a special foreknowledge of persons, not some thing, but rather SOME ONE......WHOM HE DID FOREKNOW.....NOT WHAT HE DID FOREKNOW. Take another look and see the biblical usage.

okay, I hear you!

lol, You can dismiss it if you want to. But you will not come to truth the way you are doing it! I could agree with you, but then we both would be wrong;)

Not really, this is just what I posted, if you do not make a distinction of the two terms, you will repeat this error everytime you post on this topic. You will never really understand those verses in Romans 8::29-30

What you are describing is Omniscience, not biblical foreknowledge. If you cannot distinguish between the two, you will not have a roper understanding. You will repeat the same error over and over.