Search results

No, open Theists deny God can fully know events until they happen, no Calvinists affirms that

No such thing as either chance or luck

They would know if Jesus had made Welches, as they saw Him making Gold Medal winning real wine one cannot be drunk and filled with Holy Spirit at that time, but can be filled with "responsible drinking"

Jesus made excellent real wine

Big problem is that sometimes we make non essentials to be required essential doctrines of the Faith

Open to all Christians, not restricted to just those who are members of that local church

Meant would it be acceptable to have Christians serve as soldiers and if necessary, even have to commit killings

Think that the biblical response would be to leave that local church if now holding to doctrines were against, instead of staying trying to "reform them"

yet they also hold that God cannot know the future until it actually happens, so would that not nullify Prophecy of the Bible then? And does not God per Bible itself state that He knows all things, and that even if not directly causing them, knows what will be happening? Their view seems to make...

You mean we we excuse ourselves from fellowshipping or participate with others churches and Christians if say were not Baptist? and yet we must make sure that they are living in known sinning without any remorse or repenting, and also that their doctrines are really heresy, not just different...

Inspiration and inerrancy only applies to the Originals, and there is NOT that much difference between CT/TR/Mt greek texts though, as major differences refers mainly to things such as did it state Lord Jesus, Jesus, or Jesus the Lord? And no variants change any major doctrines, as Nas/Esv/Nkjv...

That doctrine of inspiration and inerrancy applies only to the originals

A War must be fought to either protect ourselves, or our friends from enemies, or else to protect and support those who are powerless to defend for themselves?

Once Japan bombed Pearl Harbor though, it then became to us a "just war?"

Think one can choose to not drink at all, or can choose to have one, but never can excuse getting enough to get drunk or having a problem drinking

I am reminded of the story heard from Chuck Swindoll, a she stated that at a Pastors conference, he knew some liked to have a cigar at lunch and others a glass of wine, but he made sure to send to the table the opposite , so Pastor for wine got cigar, and for cigar got wine

I never liked beer myself, and just like once in a while a sweet wine if eating out for supper, as my family used to go to Frankenmuth Mi for Christmas day, and would order a glass of their sweet cherry wine to go with the food

Very important point that you make here, as if I am around a Christian who has a problem with alcohol, or else sees it totally prohibited, would never order a glass of wine if out to dinner, but wou;d not also rail against someone who wished to order a beer or a glass of wine either, as I would...

God is Omniscient, correct?

Know that many do uphold must never taste any once saved, but is that a cultural norm more than stated directly in the Bible as strict prohibition?