Search results

On and on, nonsense followed by absurdity, one false claim after another. Did the poster even address "receiving" the reconciliation well after Christ died? Nope. All they do is ignore scripture and post non-germane verses as if they supported their fiction. And never mind the false and...

James 1:18 NASB In the exercise of His will He gave us birth by the word of truth, so that we would be a kind of first fruits among His creatures. Here the noun the neuter gender is used to refer to either all of humanity or those born anew of humanity. My view is that humanity is in view...

Romans 1:20 NASB For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, that is, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, being understood by what has been made, so that they are without excuse. Here the unstudied view might be...

Begging the lost to be reconciled to God is a ministry to those already reconciled? Nonsense Since how far before the time of Paul's writings is not specified this addition is offered, "they were reconciled when Christ died." Of course this ignores that we have the ministry of reconciliation...

Now we have an absurd argument hoisted to obfuscate. Since how far before the time of Paul's writings is not specified this addition is offered, they were reconciled when Christ died. Of course this ignores that we have the ministry of reconciliation, where we beg the lost to be reconciled...

I see I made a typo in the reference of #4, "Ktistes" (G2939). This noun is used once in scripture, in 1 Peter 4:19, not 4:13. 1 Peter 4:19 NASB Therefore, those also who suffer according to the will of God are to entrust their souls to a faithful Creator in doing what is right. Here the...

Why not "from the beginning of the creation of everything, God created them (humans) male and female? I had expected someone to have raised this question. The reason is that God has continued His creation of men and women, thus "from the beginning" and not "in the beginning." So the studied...

Yes, those reconciled were reconciled in the past, at the time Paul wrote the verse. :)

Mark 10:6 NASB “But from the beginning of creation, God CREATED THEM MALE AND FEMALE. The first step in discernment is to consider each verse in context, and see if we can determine which meaning (everything, including the physical realm and the spiritual realm such as...

On and on, verse after verse, these poster simply obfuscate the obvious. Romans 5:10 NASB For if while we were enemies we were reconciled to God through the death of His Son, much more, having been reconciled, we shall be saved]by His life. All this verse says...

While I agree in part, narrowing the scope of all based on context, my specific conclusion differs. I think "all" refers to all humanity, those to be saved and those never to be saved. And I disagree that paying the ransom automatically saves those ransomed. Paying the ransom provided the...

False doctrine is mostly defended by two ploys, to attack the person trying to present truth, or claim the presentation is unclear or not understandable, again changing the subject to process from substance. Those seeking truth should see these ploys for what they are, non-responsive responses...

Recently I opined that to translate two or more Greek words into the same English word made it difficult to discern what (if any) distinction the inspired word choice was intended to convey. Naturally someone countered with the observation sometimes two or more different Greek words are used to...

So do I. :) The OP is in English.

1) To draw a distinction between every human and every creature and then only imply every creature is a subset of humanity is pure malarkey. 2) Every one of Peter's audience is non-germane to the discussion. 3) Yes, everyone who does not heed the gospel will be destroyed, but that is...

Some words are used interchangeably, but the words listed in the OP are not.

When the CT and MT agree over and against the TR, only an only-ist would post "taint so." The NASB runs from the controversy by adding to the text "O God" in italics. Not their finest hour.

Yes it is. As Mr. Churchill said, "Is this the sort of tommyrot up with I must put."

I have no idea where such nonsense come from. Christ died as a ransom for all, those to be saved and those never to be saved. Thus He provides the means of reconciliation to anyone who hears and understands the gospel, but only those who "receive the reconciliation" are those God intended to save.

I claim to be a bible student, studying God's word as commanded in scripture. I do not claim to have any credentials indicating my view should be accepted over any other studied view. That bag belongs to those who peddle God's word. Yes, I do say, with scripture, that portions of the gospel...