• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Search results

  1. V

    Interchangeable words, or confused meanings?

    If two similar but different Greek words are translated into the same English word, then those reading the English translation can not see any distinction. That IS the problem.
  2. V

    Does Free Will Limit God?

    Again, the issue is not whether any poster's speculation answers the question, but what does God's word say. 1) If God wants... Some might read this as suggesting God might not want everyone to come to him. Scripture is clear, God desires all people to be saved according to His redemption...
  3. V

    Was The Apostles Commission in Mark 16:15-16 Fulfilled In 60 AD

    False doctrines arise from poor translation choices, such as translating a word that means "in" as if it meant "to."
  4. V

    Interchangeable words, or confused meanings?

    More addressing me and running from the topic. Folks, this is all they have. The word used by inspiration in 1 Corinthians 3:1 refers to lost unregenerate people, and Paul used spiritual milk to address them, as he also did addressing new born believers. The verse invalidates their false...
  5. V

    Was The Apostles Commission in Mark 16:15-16 Fulfilled In 60 AD

    Yes, the Greek word translated "to" and "in" is the preposition "en: with the primary meaning of to be within something. Translating "en" as "to" is rare, with most modern translations going with "in." Exceptions using "to" include the RSV, NRSV, but not the ESV, the NIV and NKJV. However...
  6. V

    Westerns

    Apparently "the border is secure" didn't ring in the blue dorm.
  7. V

    Interchangeable words, or confused meanings?

    On and on, change of subject posts are posted by those offering falsehood. Did Paul, speaking to brethren address them in the same way he spoke to unregenerate lost individuals? Yes. Their off topic posts are a smokescreed to hide biblical truth. That is why they post in my opinion...
  8. V

    Was The Apostles Commission in Mark 16:15-16 Fulfilled In 60 AD

    Not addressing Mark 16:15-16, but addressing Colossians 1:23, we have two different statements presented by the translators. In the KJV, quoted above, we have the statement that the gospel has been preached to every creature which is under heaven." However, if we look at the NASB, we have...
  9. V

    Interchangeable words, or confused meanings?

    False claim belittling me and avoiding the topic. Why these advocating their indoctrination think the use of fallacious argumentation has merit is beyond me.
  10. V

    Westerns

    The American culture that embraced "Westerns" has aged pretty much out of existence. I used to watch western's on TV in 1950, with John Wayne, James Steward, Hop-a-long Cassidy, and of course the Lone Ranger. But the idea of people with their word as their bond is no longer. The non-stop...
  11. V

    Interchangeable words, or confused meanings?

    Yet another false claim based on an agenda driven viewpoint. No mention of 1 Corinthians 3:1 which says Paul used spiritual milk to speak to lost/unsaved people.
  12. V

    Interchangeable words, or confused meanings?

    Pointless to continue Sir.
  13. V

    Interchangeable words, or confused meanings?

    Yes, the primary purpose was to show that the two Greek words were not used interchangeably, and that therefore the use of one in 1 Corinthians 3:1 indicated Paul spoke to lost unregenerate people using spiritual milk. Opposition seems based on an agenda driven effort, rather than rational...
  14. V

    Interchangeable words, or confused meanings?

    Yes, for reasons unclear to me, we disagree in general. I presented an argument for the exclusive use of G4560 to refer to unregenerate or physical material. You have not said why you believe otherwise. Hard to proceed toward common understanding on that path.
  15. V

    John Calvin - Textual critic

    It is the opinion of the person who wrote the blurb. It asserts that the PCT is error free. But I agree, No the PCT is not error free. Thanks for coming to your senses. :)
  16. V

    John Calvin - Textual critic

    Here, from the internet is one person's view of the KJB-PCE: By the term Pure Cambridge Text, I refer to a perfect King James Bible as it was printed between the end of WWI and until 1985, but is now being printed by Church Bible Publishers. If you were to look at the English Bible on a...
  17. V

    John Calvin - Textual critic

    I am not sure you are addressing me but if you are, please stop addressing my bad behavior, in your opinion. Such argumentation is a well known fallacy. You seemed to be saying Calvin view of scripture was heresy. He was certainly wrong sometimes but perhaps not all the time. I enjoyed...
  18. V

    John Calvin - Textual critic

    No serious bible scholar would think the original autographs have undergone transmission without the introduction of error. The premise that the KJV 1611 version was without error is not to be taken seriously, only sadly.
  19. V

    John Calvin - Textual critic

    I agree, this thread is not humorous, it is sad indeed.
Top