• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Search results

  1. L

    New Book on the Doctrine of Scripture

    The Bible doctrine of inspiration and the doctrine of preservation were not thrown out by the NKJV translators. KJV-only advocates may hold and advocate a very inconsistent and unsound doctrine of inspiration and doctrine of preservation that they do not apply consistently and justly to before...
  2. L

    "There is safety in believing the words of the KJV Bible." A powerful quote by our Board member, JD731.

    The fact of actual errors in editions of the KJV has not yet been resolved since a few errors can sometimes still be found in post-1980 editions of the KJV. At Exodus 6:21, the standard revised 1769 Oxford edition of the KJV introduced a new error of fact, the name of the wrong person...
  3. L

    "There is safety in believing the words of the KJV Bible." A powerful quote by our Board member, JD731.

    The KJV translators may have left uncorrected the error of the name of the wrong group of people “Amorites” (1 Kings 11:5) that is in the 1602 edition of the Bishops’ Bible, which could make them responsible for this error of fact being found in the 1611. At 2 Kings 24:19, the 1611 edition has...
  4. L

    New Book on the Doctrine of Scripture

    The NKJV was not denigrated purposedly the Lord Jesus Christ at Acts 3:26, Acts 4:27, or Acts 4:30 when they accurately translated the Greek word any more than the KJV was at Matthew 12:18. This same Greek word found at Acts 4:27 and 30 was also used of Jesus at Matthew 12:18a where it was...
  5. L

    "There is safety in believing the words of the KJV Bible." A powerful quote by our Board member, JD731.

    Is there safety in believing the words of any and every edition of the KJV? Is there actual safety in believing any errors in KJV editions to be true and not errors? Exodus 20:14 Thou shalt commit adultery {1631 London KJV edition}
  6. L

    2 Kings 23:29; Another issue with and a Question; Why Didn't the NKJV Translators Catch that?

    Have all the different definitions of "against" been considered? Concerning the KJV’s use of against with the meaning “opposite, confronting”, Ronald Bridges and Luther Weigle noted: “It is generally understandable as used in the KJV, but occasionally is ambiguous or has an obsolete sense” (p...
  7. L

    Is Ussher's Bible Chronology correct?

    Are you claiming that the genealogies that God revealed and had recorded in Scripture do not edify anyone? This thread was more about the chronology of the Scriptures, not the genealogies in Scripture.
  8. L

    THIS is an Essentisl Tool for all KJVO to have and use now

    Yes, there can be a wrong division, and your inconsistent, non-scriptural KJV-only interpretations are an example of it.
  9. L

    New Book on the Doctrine of Scripture

    The seeming duplicity of KJV-only advocates who use different measures/standards for the process of the making of the KJV than for the process of the making of the NKJV would be a matter for concern.
  10. L

    New Book on the Doctrine of Scripture

    According to a consistent, just application of the same exact measures/standards, the NKJV's Old Testament also "constitutes perfectly normal and perfectly healthy perspicacious translation philosophy and practice."
  11. L

    New Book on the Doctrine of Scripture

    The KJV translators consulted the same Roman Catholic Latin Vulgate. The KJV translators had Hebrew-Latin lexicons and Greek-Latin lexicons that often had renderings from the Roman Catholic Latin Vulgate as their definitions of original-language words of Scripture. There were not complete...
  12. L

    Is Ussher's Bible Chronology correct?

    Douglas Woodward reported that Justin Martyr (100-165) “states in numerous passages that the Jews altered their Bible, thinking that could keep their Jewish fold from fleeing to the Christians” (Septuagint, p. 65). Douglas Woodward quoted an article by Jeremy Sexton and Henry Smith, Jr. where...
  13. L

    Is Ussher's Bible Chronology correct?

    Douglas Woodward asked: "Is the evidence plain enough to justify the claims that rabbinical schools at the end of the first century intentionally corrupted what became the Masoretic Text?" (Rebooting the Bible, Part One, p. 105). Douglas Woodward listed "Key Salvific and Messianic Passages...
  14. L

    Is Ussher's Bible Chronology correct?

    Here are a couple examples of the difference in the chronology between Josephus' translation of Hebrew sacred books that is in agreement with the old Greek Septuagint and the chronology in the KJV translated from the Hebrew Masoretic Text. Flavius Josephus as translated by William Whiston...
  15. L

    Is Ussher's Bible Chronology correct?

    Douglas Woodward wrote: "[James] Ussher relied upon the genealogies of Genesis 5 and 11, as published a few decades earlier (1611) in the King James Bible" (Rebooting the Bible, Part One, p. 137). Douglas Woodward quoted where Henry B. Smith, Jr., wrote: "Ephraem of Syria [306-373 A. D.] is...
  16. L

    New Book on the Doctrine of Scripture

    The earlier manuscript portions of the Greek Septuagint could not have come from the later Codex Vaticanus or Codex alexandrinis. Edmon Gallagher wrote: "Our earliest manuscripts of the Septuagint usually contain only one biblical book, at least in their preserved form. The earliest manuscripts...
  17. L

    New Book on the Doctrine of Scripture

    The KJV translators also consulted the Greek Septuagint and Jerome's Roman Catholic Latin Vulgate. Erasmus added some readings to his edited Greek text from an edition of the Roman Catholic Latin Vulgate. KJV defender Edward F. Hills acknowledged that “sometimes also the influence of the...
  18. L

    New Book on the Doctrine of Scripture

    It has been substantiated that the NKJV is as faithfully based on the Textus Receptus as the pre-1611 English Bibles are and as the 1611 KJV is.
  19. L

    New Book on the Doctrine of Scripture

    I have this book IT IS WRITTEN: A BELIEVER'S GUIDE TO THE DOCTRINE OF SCRIPTURE, and I have read it. Graham Chewter wrote: “This claim of perfection is held by the ‘King James Only’ movement which arose during the 1970s and was spearheaded by the late Peter Ruckman” (Hooper, It Is Written, p...
  20. L

    Critical warning for KJB believers from Bryan Ross

    G. John Rov wrote: “At the heart of the King James Bible issue is this right here, to believe God” (Called of God, p. 38). G. John Rov asserted: “You can never bear perfect fruit if you have not believed on the King James Bible” (Concealed from Christians, p. 166). John Rov wrote: “Are you...
Top