Search results

The Baptist Church that I am a member of and attend would be non Calvinist, but in the major doctrines and issues would agree, and allow for one as Baptist to hold to a differing view on certain doctrines

The Creeds and Confessions would be detailing to us what Christians on the whole see the bible as meaning to us

We can and should learn form the gifted expositors and teachers from past and present, as the Holy Spirit did send them as gifts to the churches to teach to us better the doctrines and applications of the bible . They are not Calvinists, but I have learned form those such as a wiersbe, Ryrie...

Very similar to when Charismatics claim the the scripture has Logos and Rheuma meanings

Which would once again having those into KJVO assigning to the 1611 translators exactly same inspiration afforded to them in translation efforts as Apostles had when penning down their original books

Its functions in English pretty much same way for them that the Hebrew and Greek lexicons for us would

True, but if they wish to keep using the Kjv, that Webster dictionary would be an essential study tool for them to be using

The Psa atonement view gives the most glory to the Trinity then any other explanation, a sit totally glorified them

Either God intended that the Cross was where Jesus died to provide a particular atonement and salvation, and that will be a definite group coming to Jesus, or else he intended to save all sinners by it, and waits upon our response, hoping some will make the "right decision" to now get saved

No, but we still have today the books written by mighty men of ther past, rich in doctrines and applications, unless we would say that we can learn nothing from likes of a Spurgeon, Sproul, macArthur and their like?

This is what happens when certain people make even the Kjv an idol

What satisfied and paid for the satisfaction of God towards His wrath towards us as sinners? A transaction happened at Calavry, as in that Cross Jesus was imputed to receive from the father what we were to get as sinners, and due to Him atoning for those sins, we are able to get imputed his...

We are to see the Bible as the supreme and only inspred authority for all doctrines, but still can use other bible tools for profit

Calvinists see Jesus death as paying in full tot he Father what is due to Him as sinners, and when he stated it is accomplished/finished, we accept that in full

Do you accept that the Holy Spirit has gifted to us bible teachers and expositors that will be able to better explain to us what scriptures teach and how to apply them?

There are 2 extremes to avoid regarding Creeds and Coinfessions, one would be to essential place them on par with Bible, and the other is to say no worth at all, as we hold to Bible only

The Holy Spirit can now do his work to save out lost sinners to lord Jesus due to His shed blood as appeasement foe the due wrath and judgment of God towards us while we were yet sinners

was he treated by the Father in same fashion all of the lost shall be?

Learned something new, as did not know either one of those

He imputes that to us correct?