Search results

WRONG. The Great Schism was largely a matter of Papal authority - not doctrine. As to Sacred Tradition - the verses you presented have nothing to do with this. They have to do with false doctrine. Paul said to the Thessalonians: 2 Thess 2:15 "Stand firm and hold fast to the Traditions you...

This is absolutely false. Christ's Church came directly from Him - THAT is who He left in charge. He didn't leave the Scriptures in charge because they hadn't been fully written yet. This is why Paul said to the Thessalonians: 2 Thess 2:15 "Stand firm and hold fast to the Traditions you were...

No - it's directly related to Sola Scriptura. When you have all of these groups claiming to have the Scriptures as their SOLE authority -yet they are all gleaning different doctrines from the same Scriptures - the problem is Sola Scriptura. It's certainly NOT the Holy Spirit nor is it the...

True - but what, is the excuse for the disunity of Sola Scriptura within Protestantism today? There are literally tens of thousands of disjointed and perpetually-splintering sects - ALL teaching different doctrines based on THEIR interpretations of Scripture - yet ALL claim to have been "led"...

Yes - I'm showing you that your Protestant understanding of the Eucharist is a 16th century invention. The Early Church unanimously held to the Catholic position . . .

I never said Jesus was a “cracker”. I said that the “cracker” is the Body of Christ. If a doctor removed your appendix and held it up – are YOU now an appendix?? NO – that appendix is part of YOU. Try to stay focused here . . .

FALSE. I showed you where pouring is prescribed in the FIRST century document, The Didache. On the other hand, YOU can't show me ONE Biblical example of full immersion Baptism . . .

Can you point me to the post where I made this claim?

TRANSLATION: "I asked for Scriptural proof - and all you could give me was . . .Scriptural proof!" My point exactly . . .

It remains the Body and Blood of Christ as long as the appearances of bread and wine exist. Once they are ingested and go down into your stomach – the appearances of bread and wine no longer exist. The same thing happens with everything you eat and drink. Didn’t you ever take a biology course??

Again with the asinine “State Controlled” moniker. Any chance of you ever providing evidence as to which state?? I didn’t think so . . . As for your claim and “some” monks burned Scripture – EVIDENCE, please. Names?? Dates?? Anything?? I can just as easily make an equally-impotent claim that...

But He DIDN'T. He used His Church to preserve the Scriptures. His Church is the pillar and foundation of Truth (1 Tim. 3:15).

Not good enough. Anybody can claim that their group goes back to the early centuries of the Church. You can align yourself with all sorts of early heretic groups. However - the plain fact is that the Catholic Church is the ONLY Church with an unbroken line of Apostolic Succession. YOUR sect...

Ummmmmmm, I already gave you Biblical examples. Let’s review . . . In 1 Corinthians 11:27-30, Paul speaks to the reality of the Eucharist and the severity of the consequences to those who take this lightly: “Therefore whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord unworthily will have...

And what part of "This IS my body" and "This IS my blood do you NOT understand?? STUDY your Bible . . .

If it weren’t for the Catholic Church and those monks – you wouldn’t have a Bible. It was THEIR painstaking care and diligent work under the guidance of the Holy Spirit that preserved the Scriptures for us. Thank GOD He kept His promise to guide His Church to ALL Truth (John 16:12-15).

Funny that the Catholic Church you trusted to accurately copy and preserve the Books of Scripture is the SAME Church you don’t trust to have copied and preserved the Letters of Ignatius. Your hypocrisy is matched only by your woeful-ignorance of history . . .

Baptists may believe this but the “RE-Baptizers” would RE-baptize anybody who Baptism they didn’t accept. Re-Baptizing people is heresy. The only thing that happens in a “RE-Baptism” is that you get wet. You keep foolishly eferring to the “State-controlled” Church. Which state “controls” the...

NONSENSE. We don’t have ANY extant copies of the original autographs Books of Scripture – not ONE. Yet you trust that THEY are genuine. We don’t have ONE single extant original autograph of Homer or Socrates – yet nobody calls them into question. The original autograph of the Edict of Milan...

Ummmmm, the Anabaptists or “RE-Baptizers” were a heretical sect., If you want to align yourself with THEM – be my guest. However – YOUR Baptist sect can only trace its origins back to John Smyth in 1606. Besides – the Anabaptists denied Sola Fide Just because the word “baptist” can be gleaned...