Search results

You have quoted the text correctly, You just apply it wrong. We know looking back who is the Messiah. Looking forward they did not. His disciples did not fully understand Luk 24:27 And beginning at Moses and all the prophets, he expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things...

We are still condemned without a knowledge of the Law, The Law, or any Law show shortcomings. To complete your position it is better NOT to tell others of their Sin , so they cant be condemned. The Law of Moses is does not apply to you

You said it was proof the OT knew Jesus name

It is all after the Resurrection ,Jesus as Christ was revealed and His work was finished. Rahab and the OT saints did not know as we know

You misapplied Peter words. the error is yours. Accept it or show me a verse that identifies the Messiah as Jesus in the OT

yes, you need further examples that you set set laws so you can keep them, Let me reiterate, the Law does not condemn but shows us a standard . We are condemned without the Law or a knowledge of the Law or your Divine Law You require a standard for your conduct. I understand your positions...

We know what it means, everything you say is true and we are grateful it has been revealed to us by the NT referring back to prophecies regarding the Messiah The OT people did not know the name of Jesus as Messiah. Y.shua or Joshua or any forms are not used in the OT for the Messiah. I think it...

In regards to the second part, In your thread of Divine Law that justifies condemning just for unjust You try to show the sacrifices for the Law kept penalty of sin from being enforced, Under Levitical Sacrificial law the death on the altar represented the sentence of death prescribed by...

Understand, what I say. you will not find His name in the OT referring to The Messiah. Not the NT, We know His name and the references from the OT for Jesus. They did not know the Messiah's name

We know His name, The Messiah has been fulfilled, The OT people did not know His name then, but do know. I will look for your quotes I was referring to on the legalism. You might not have intended to mean as I received it

He keeps his promises, one is to never leave us

Man is already in a state of rejection, He chose to sin. Did Satan have free will to sin?

He would rather all accept Him, He does as He promises to do. Hebrews 13:5 King James Version (KJV) 5 Let your conversation be without covetousness; and be content with such things as ye have: for he hath said, I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee.

Once God makes a promise, it is kept. The Choice to be saved is not conditional upon our merit or behavior

He made us. We sinned and rejected Him yet He came to save us. He promised to keep us. We are not more powerful than Him. We are secure

The fact of the name of Jesus means something is of no consequence. The people in the OT did not know His name. I did not say you are against Salvation by Grace. I said you also emphasis additional law .even in Grace

it is a common name 4 are in scripture in the OT There are derivations too. The OT did not know the name Jesus or Y'shua or Yĕhowshuwa` particular to the Messiah 218 times, none relate to the Messiah I make the claim because of your emphasis on "God's Law " , looks like more rules for...

God has opportunities for us to serve Him to show others Salvation, We cant serve unless we accept His will over ours. In surrender to His Salvation There is only complete surrender, at that point we may be chosen for particular service that God has prepared and prepared us for God directs us...

Faith alone dies not save. We have to have faith in the correct place, We believe Christ is willing and able to accomplish salvation, or His promises

Your's unless you think we rely on Chris's faith of finished action. We don't need faith of what is accomplished. Heb 11