Search results

Having clearly and patiently explained the 'all truth scenario' in my previous post, you apparently are 'too intelligent' to discern the obvious. Are you among the swelling Pro-Papist crowd in your theological and prophetic outlook?

Your argument, when examined with care, negates a sound hermeneutical principle. Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: In the immediate context, Jesus was speaking to His disciples. Yet while there is an immediate context, there is at the same...

Had you taken the care to read the first verse of Ephesians, you would have realized the Epistle was written to the saints which are at Ephesus, and to the faithful in Christ Jesus: Were there not the faithful In Christ Jesus throughout the ages? And did not this Epistle hold as much...

Are all the members of the Southern Baptist Convention also deceived? Please note: one Church, one Body. The Church and the Body are one and the same. This particular section of their Baptist Faith and Message is under the heading ‘The Church.’ http://www.sbc.net/bfm2000/bfm2000.asp...

LOL. DHK has now become unglued. He would like to believe the Lord has not placed teachers in His one Body by whom the Body would be led, via the Spirit, into all truth. DHK needs no teachers. He is his own teacher. The Spirit has private conversations with him alone out of which come...

Originally Posted by Protestant: "The Body of Christ is comprised of those Elect worldwide (Jew and Gentile) who make up the many members of Christ’s Body." Protestant Quote: "Christ is the Head of the Body….the Head of the Church Universal." Sorry for the delay in responding...

On the contrary, he gave no such meaning. You attempted to put words into his mouth which he did not utter. Which is why I am amazed you even drew attention to him in the first place. The witnesses he brought forth soundly refute that which is a figment of your imagination: a future...

On the contrary, both have much in common because: (1) both deal with biblical truth. (2) both deal with majority versus minority opinion. Re: biblical translations......your argument was based on the overwhelming number of translations which agree with your view......unlike that of...

'Hypocrisy is the claim or pretense of holding beliefs, feelings, standards, qualities, opinions, behaviors, virtues, motivations, or other characteristics that one does not in actual fact hold. It is the practice of engaging in the same behavior or activity for which one criticizes another.'...

I am impressed that you use Adam Clarke as a scholarly Christian reference. I would urge you to actually read his commentary on 2 Thess. 2. Not once does he say, “not necessarily having directly to do with The Great Tribulation.” Those words are a fiction. Rather, Clarke admits...

I thank you for your replies! Although I have more questions, for now I must concentrate on the above quote of yours. Speaking of Adam Clarke as a universally recognized Bible authority: his commentary on Daniel 9:24-27 differs vastly from your Futurist interpretation. Adam holds to the...

I am doing my best to understand your ‘unique’ Futurist doctrinal views. In your view: The Church is raptured before the 7-year tribulation period. The 7-year tribulation period is signified as Daniel’s 70th week. The Rapture occurs at Rev. 4:1. The Holy Spirit, still present, is...

Please re-examine the Greek text of Romans 8:16. The Greek pronoun used is αὐτός, meaning ‘the self same.’ The referenced Scripture speaks to the identified subject ‘Spirit.’ The NKJV also corrects the error found in the KJV: The Spirit Himself bears witness with our spirit that we...

Originally Posted by Protestant : How is it that people and the Word of God can work through some, but not all spiritually dead people? And how is it you awoke from spiritual death, while most others do not. What was it that made you differ? Was the difference found in a special...

I am quoting DHK from a Baptist Only thread entitled ‘Biblical Tension.’ He rightly understands the need for preaching Jesus as the means God has ordained to bring sinners to saving knowledge of Christ. However, once again an insurmountable difficulty arises. Classic Futurist teaching...

Thank you. You admit the ‘Restrainer’ is the Holy Spirit of whom Paul speaks. This has been my consistent position as to the classic Futurist teaching. You have now reversed your previous position to agree with me. That being the case, why then does Paul not refer to the Holy Spirit by...

Originally Posted by Protestant : How is it that people and the Word of God can work through some, but not all spiritually dead people? And how is it you awoke from spiritual death, while most others do not. What was it that made you differ? Was the difference found in a special...

No, I ‘ain’t.’ I am still waiting for your literalist interpretation of the first vision of Jesus Christ which sets the tone and method of interpretation for the rest of the Revelation. I also await your literalist explanation as to why the Lord needs 144,000 virgins. I await your...

Darby and Luther have nothing to do with the questions raised. I suggest you stay on point, difficult as that may be. You have authoritatively declared ‘in error’ the Futurists who believe the Holy Spirit to be the ‘Restrainer’, as well as those who believe the 144,000 to be Jewish...

How is it that people and the Word of God can work through some, but not all spiritually dead people? And how is it you awoke from spiritual death, while most others do not. What was it that made you differ? Was the difference found in a special quality of yours, or was it that the Holy...