Search results

When any human being fails to be intellectually perfect, or (put differently) is a human... They are being imperfect humans. I agree.

If you want a "simple" answer: You're wrong: And KJVO's are being perfectly "logical" in their beliefs. You don't want that, so....

I have never had an odious amount of respect for "Dr. Bob's" opinions.... Do with that what you will. He was a perfectly nice man, I'm sure.

You won't get one, not every answer is simple.

Compared to you.... Yes. I have degrees in Philosophy from the University of Central Florida, and Theology from the University of London. I have written no textbooks: But, I didn't invent the "frogs are street-fighters" argument myself. It's hilarious: Admittedly, I studied that. As far as...

It's neither logical nor illogical: Here's a perfectly logical statement: 1.) All frogs are street-fighters 2.) All street-fighters are devoted to non-violence. 3.) Therefore all frogs are devoted to non-violence. Here's another one: 1.) Socrates was a man 2.) All men are mortal 3.) Therefore...

Let's explain basic logic to Logos: Let's pretend that I am debating the affirmative position that the person which calls themselves "Logos" does not exist: I put out these points: 1.) "Logos" is nominally merely a Greek word with Philosophical sophistication meaning something variously like...

One only "begs the question" if (in a debate) or, if when they argue for a premise, they assume the premise... You're just using what you think is a catchy phrase. Kjvo's are no more or less likely to do that than any number of other groups do. You can't "beg the question"....unless you are...

Assuming an untrue premise doesn't violate the laws of logic! Logic is about the form an argument takes! That's always been true. I know KJVO conclusions are false: Their logic is usually perfectly valid: I just also know that you don't understand basic "laws of logic". I know that you were...

Nothing: I didn't "suspect" as much. I KNEW as much. The King James Bible isn't perfect: I know of numerous flaws in it. Some aren't "flaws" but, places where I think it could/should have been translated differently: EVERY translation has that issue. Most of my complaints against KJV are...

Where you at Piper? Name one "law of logic" (whatever that means) that KJVO violates: I sit with baited breath: Go on:

It violates none: I stand by this, delineate ONE! Not all of them delineate ONE! YOU and I are both on simultaneously,....just delineate ONE, only ONE argument: Not all......ONE. I'm online, and so are you. Proceed:

It does not violate laws of logic: If it did, it would not be as prevalent as it is. It's false: But, it doesn't violate laws of logic. Perhaps it's Theologically unsound ( a fair characterization). But, that isn't a violation of the laws of "logic". Perhaps it's not consistently applied by...

I think that James White spent one tenth of the amount of time and research you have: And I paid money for his book: Read it thoroughly twice: (didn't find it particularly helpful)....but, it was reasonably scholarly and well-written for all that. I have paid zero dollars and zero cents for...

Oh, I don't care what you think about the Scriptures B.T.W: I know you don't care what I think either so....why post this?

Lemme double-down actually: I think, despite the VOLUMES of random verbiage you copy-paste on this board: I don't actually think you know what you're talking about. I don't think you understand KJVO's at all. I don't think you are actually qualified to speak on the topic: I think you confuse...

I'm saying I do little but toy with you on this board: And, I don't take you seriously. I never have. You probably shouldn't take me seriously either. But, I doubt you could help yourself.

Then MAYBE ALL KJVO's don't fall into the category that he was accussing them of! IF that is so then LOGICALLY there is no direct link between KJVO and a failure at missions... That absolutely was his claim! Actually, I just think he's mad about some money he thinks he's got coming (since the...

O.K. You win. I actually find you merely a passably interesting debate opponent. I neither like you, dislike you, love you, or hate you. or anything you have to say. I NOTHING you, or your books, or your opinions. Occassionally, I am in the mood to debate you, just for kicks (or...

Did you bother to notice that John of Japan had an entire thread wherein he TRASHED KJVO's for their committment to international missions? Oh, I know he said it quite sweetly: But, he essentially accused all KJVO's of not being Biblically sound on missions (while, of course, simultaneously...