Search results

She would definitely be a virtuosic guitarist in a genre you wouldn't like. I don't particularly care for her style either, but she's innovative. Glenn Campbell used Ovations, as I'm sure you know, and Melissa Ethridge. They're not for me, but I appreciate what Ovations are made for

I found this interesting and informing video about Ovations when I was doing some of my initial research..... I know they fell out of favour in the 90's or so, but in this video, he explains they may be making a comeback and why. They were indeed innovative. Apparently they are a favourite of...

Cool! Mine has proprietary Godin electronics in it too! 'Zactly! A Snark tuner costs less than 20 bucks and is accurate and has a quicker response time. I have an onboard tuner, but I prefer to use the simple Snark...

I'm not convinced. Personally, I own and love (and use as my first learner guitar) a Seagull s6 beginner or expert, I've done some research, and have seen nothing to recommend Zager. Zager never talks tonewoods, which is critical for an acoustic. A great guitar sounds better as it ages (an...

It does sound like Fuller's firing might have been questionable.

Rev..... You didn’t actually watch the video you posted did you? I’ve asked numerous times, and you refuse to answer.... Did you even watch the video? Did you know it was a Founders Ministries slander?

I have been insulting...but, no more than you have. I've engaged in no ad-hominems. I know a LOT about your views on the SBC...you debate them here regularly. I read this forum far more than I post on it. No, I read your posts...I've been reading your posts for nearly a decade. I know what...

Seriously??? I'm not "miserable". I know you're grasping. A video from the arch-Calvinist "Founders" group got you up in arms. I wonder if you even watched the video enough to KNOW it was from the Founders Ministries...That's an arch-Calvinist group which is trying to subvert the same SBC you...

Oh, the stupidity.... We can go around in circles like that if you want.

You can't define what "It" is. I watched it carefully and fully and thoughtfully. You are just saying "NO TAIN'T SO" at this point. I disagree with you Mithchell, and the good doctor, and I've expressed why I do. Put your big-girl panties on and deal with it.

https://www.amazon.com/Misreading-Scripture-Western-Eyes-Understand-ebook/dp/B00BL3JXYE/ref=sr_1_1?crid=T85ILBAEPYSI&dchild=1&keywords=misreading+scripture+with+western+eyes&qid=1589922715&sprefix=misreading+%2Caps%2C285&sr=8-1 Digest.... grow.... learn.

No, you don't. You have a more limited one. You think you do. And you come by it honestly, because you tend to assume every Bible author's intention is to reinforce the same Theological premises. I used to think that way. It's wrong. It isn't a "higher" view, of Scripture.... It's one which...

"Myth" is not synonymous with or assumed to be "false"...…….(in academic speak) Our good doctor knows this, I don't doubt. So....maybe.

That depends on how, exactly one defines "Mythology"....Mythology is NOT a synonym for "false" (as our good doctor alleged) I think rather oddly. "Mythology" as spoken of in scholarly circles does not mean something we assume to be untrue. I am sure you know that the term is (admittedly to...

I have no interest in the lies and slanders proffered by the likes of the Founders Ministries slanderers...... I'd encourage everyone to take this particular slander with a grain of salt. Their criticisms are (in a setting of higher Theological education) rather minor. I can understand the...

Sure....But it doesn’t make it God’s house, nor any closer to being God’s house than if they didn’t. Passages about the Jerusalem Temple have zero relevance to church facilities.

One thing I wish churches would cease doing is referring to their facilities, buildings, sanctuaries etc....as "God's House". The indwelled believer, and, more specifically, the gathered indwelled believers where his Spirit dwells with men is "God's House". We do not "Gather together in the...

No, it doesn't. Pelagius never thought that. I'm sorry, you're mistaken. If you want to imagine such a theology as existing and inexplicably name it "Pelagianism" than feel free to, but it would be gratuitously random to call it that and it would have no basis in historical fact. This imagined...

Pelagius never believed that and it is provably false that he believed it. And it is also wrong. Calvinist Theologians have believed that lie from Augustine and taught it, and now some believe it. It is not true. Thus, the bogeyman slander of "Pelagianism" is a meaningless and ignorant...

Nobody is concerned about the bogeyman lie that is the slander of "Pelagianism". That's overplayed. Taking all available evidence, I'd say there is about a 200% higher likelihood that Pelagius was saved than the evil and slanderous Gnostic Augustine. Nobody is actually "Pelagian"...