Search results

Nice sources. Unfortunately they don't back up your assertion that passengers, by federal law, have to obey any order given by a crew member.

Meaning once again, you have no proof. Just an opinion. Moving on.

Meaning you have no proof they are required to use the words "federal law". Just another opinion. And yours is worth no more than that of anyone else. But Now, it's time to put up or shut up. Quote the statute in law that says passengers have to obey whatever crew members order them to do..

Do you have any proof they are required to use the words "federal law"?

When will the CDC correct its COVID death counts, as Italy just did? Never. Everybody knows the numbers are artificially inflated, but the CDC is politically invested in the lie and have to follow the orders of their political masters.

I agree...up to a point. Living in Texas, a business may require their customers to wear masks. I leave when they do. There are lots of shopping alternatives available. Flying? I really had no choice this time. So, I complied. I believe Airline personnel are saying it's a "Federal Law" for...

I see it differently. I believe to most rabid group is the one that tries to demonize and criminalize anyone who refuses to be vaccinated.

I flew on a commercial airline recently. Not a pleasant experience. But what I really got tired or hearing from the crew and airline employees was this lie: "Refusing to wear a mask is a violation of FEDERAL LAW."

It was bound to happen. The Constitutional problems are apparent to anyone that cares to look.

I don't believe much else that he had to say, but he got that part right.

The only data on the street when millions of people received their first Moderna shot was 94.1% effective at preventing symptomatic Covid-19 after the second dose" It's not turning out to be even really very close.In some places 80% of the people coming down with the virus are vaccinated, Most...

Well, nobody but you.:rolleyes: "In August, the CDC also published studies that showed mRNA vaccine protection against infection may be waning, although the vaccines were still highly effective against hospitalization. In one CDC study, data from the state of New York showed vaccine...

And you think that would work? :Roflmao He wouldn't dare to face me, just like he hasn't dared to face anyone else, especially her family.

Based on information at the time, we were sold a bill of goods. After phase 3 trial: "The Moderna vaccine was 94.1% effective at preventing symptomatic Covid-19 after the second dose" That clearly turned out to be grossly inaccurate and that's the figure most people based their decision on...

I don't.Not for anything at all. Until just recently, the coward was being shielded for political reasons. He's a murderer, pure and simple.

"The unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims." Paul was not a terrorist. To compare his actions to ISIS is totally ridiculous.

I'm being kind. ;)

If you can get me in front of him, I will have no problem saying it to his face, after introducing myself

I revise my comment. It appears that only for partisan political reasons will you condone murder. At least, I hope that's the case.

Evidence? Or just an assumption?