Search results

What Jon is saying runs completely counter to Pfizer's own pharmicokinetics study. I don't know why he keeps posting this stuff, when he's been provided with the information, already. All of his sources are second-hand. The vaccine was supposed to stay at the injection site, but most of it...

The argument was a reductio ad absurdum. The purpose of this kind of argument is to show how stupid the opponent's position is by taking it to its foolish illogical conclusion. You don't disprove this kind of argument by playing dumb, taking the statement literally, as though you didn't know...

We say that he is right.

Yes, vaccinated healthcare workers are very much a threat. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Delta Variant Among Vaccinated Healthcare Workers, Vietnam

Yes, I know. He's still the most qualified voice on the subject. The subject is vaccines.

Yeadon is just about the single most qualified voice on the subject. He's very much against the vaccines, and for good reason.

Yes, but only temporarily, 'til death do us un-part.

Looks like I'm going to become unemployed, soon.

What makes them experts? Did they perform a pharmicokinetics study on the vaccine? No, they didn't. They're making statements based on their own assumptions.

I already did. Did you read the article?

1) The spike protein is toxic. It's a vascular toxin. 2) The vaccine causes the spike protein to be produced in your body 3) The vaccine travels throughout your body. These are the points I assert, and they are supported by the studies by Pfizer and Salk. If you have a disagreement with...

Apparently Dr. Adam Ratner is a lying idiot. The pharmicokinetics study done by Pfizer already establishes that the injection travels throughout the body. Did Ratner perform a pharmicokinetics study on the vaccine? No, he didn't. He's full of himself.

I suppose you could be forgiven for not recognizing the names of the researchers in the article I already linked to you. That was the the Salk article. To ease your offended sensibilities, I'll link something with the Salk name on it: The novel coronavirus’ spike protein plays additional key...

No, it's true. The Salk Institute already established that the spike protein is a toxin all of its own. Pfizer already published their study that the "vaccine" travels to other parts of the body. The Japanese paper mentioned in the OP...

Censorship of opposing viewpoints is manipulation. Your side are the manipulators. That's the rhetoric of lying despots. Only a liar must protect his ideas by silencing the opposition. You speak from arrogance, you know. Somehow, you managed to sort through the mix of lies and truth, and...

See, now that's where this discussion gets foolish. You start talking about force, then morph into suggesting that the free exchange of ideas is some manner of totalitarian force, because it leads to the free exchange of ideas that don't agree with your position. Then, then next logical step...

People will die at an increasing rate from things officially other than COVID vaccines. But the post was a mockery of the one before it. It's easy to post a litany of lies, isn't it, though?

Mutation only serves to make it different and harder for the immune system to recognize. It does not make the virus inherently worse. For the unvaccinated, the virus was a super-bug with super-strong powers of adhesion with its powerful spikes. Any change from that is an improvement in the...

If you're referring to my post, the information came from the scientists who developed the vaccines. If you don't trust them, then I guess we agree on something.

The broadness of natural immunity relates to antibodies against multiple viral proteins. For example, antibody-dependent enhancement was not observed with vaccines against the N-protein (nucleocapsid), or the H1 subunit located at the base of the spike protein. Anti-N-protein antibodies...