I do. And this is an excellent example. Time proved the "new ice age" theory wrong. The data was the same for everyone....but the conclusions differed.@JonC
You do remember that the vast, vast majority of scientific experts said we would all be dead from another Ice age that was supposed to arrive in the 1990s. Then we were supposed to be killed off by now by global warming.
Just because there is a consensus does not believe it is correct.
My view is consistent....look at the data, ignore the conclusions and statistical "evidence". Time will tell.
Both sides of the vaccination vs anti-vaccination are depending on these scientists.
Scientists say we need to be vaccinated and scientists say we do not need to be vaccinated.
Some say the spike protein is what allows the virus to infect cells (this is actually an old observation from past coronaviruses). Others say "not so". It really doesn't matter as long as spike protein is a character of the Delta varient.
My point is....how do you choose which of these scientists to believe and which ones to discount?
Many Christian scientists urge people to get vaccinated (many do not). How do you pick which ones to believe?