Search results

I dont

The first or second views. It's literal or the punishment metaphorical. Instead of flaming fire it may be something else.

The best post of this thread.

This is a thread on tithing not a thread debating the theology of MacArthur and Comfort. If you want to debate their theology then start a new thread.

I was serious about the challenge.

Find me a chapter and a verse teaching tithing in the NT.

Its not taught in the NT. Your argument is one from silence. What is clearly taught in the NT is free will giving.

If you only focus on the physical and ignore the real reason people need help then yes.

Have been preaching since 2009.

I have no idea who has gotten saved via my efforts. Your problem is that you look for visible results.

I never said to ignore the physical needs.

If I had not mentioned his doctrines even you would call him effective.

I was talking about his false accusation that I do not interpret all the Bible literally.

They hold to another gospel so impossible.

This is good indeed.

This is a lie!

Can you not answer the post instead of attacking me?

Dialogued with a pastor of a church that feeds the homeless, attracts new people to his church, has programs for the poor, and runs an effective ministry. In the eyes of many on this board this pastor is an effective evangelist. But hear the catch. He denies that Hell is real, believes everyone...

I am in a Baptist Church that does not teach tithing.

Okay so even those in house loans should not give money to the church?