Search results

The facts and evidence that Christ made new wine at the wedding, is not that I can't prove it (which I have abundantly done) but that above all, you cannot see, understand, and especially refuse to BELIEVE it.

NONE of my posts are unrelated on this topic. It is only because you cannot understand the new covenant that you cannot understand that EVERYTHING in both the old and new testament points to Christ and the work of HIS hands, the body of Christ.

If one can understand the fact that: 1-.Christ made NEW wine at the wedding feast.(not new grape juice) 2-the teaching of the new covenant is included in the teaching of the wedding feast. (I gave you and abundance of evidence) 3-Since the Lord's supper is an ordinance of the NEW covenant as the...

I have gone to multiple topics today because I was giving you and answer to the points you made Tuesday that I was not able to get to yesterday. I told you I would not avoid nor not give an answer to your questions, You should have recognized that. . Again, go back and read VERY SLOWLY my...

I NEVER said at any time that the sinner is directed to the wedding feast for salvation. This is just anothe one of intentional attempt to pervert what I am saying because you don't have an answer. When I attributed a quote to Jerome that you had made, I had to decency to apologize. You, on...

The wedding feast includes the prophesy of the new covenant. It is by the new covenant that it is revealed "the only true God and Jesus Christ whom thou has sent" (Jn 17:3) Christ also say in the same verse, "And this is eternal salvation." The wedding feasts points to the new covenant...

The two previous posts are answer to your question about oinos. Since most of my posts seem to be longer and involve more, that is why takes me a little longer to post. I, unlike you, will give you an answer

I Tim 3:3 says in regard to the qualifications of a bishop that he is not given to wine, I Tim 3:8 clarifies the intent in the word given when he gives the qualifications of a deacon in not given to MUCH wine. Why allow the bishop but not the deacon? There is no difference in either verse...

Matthew :26:29 and Mark 14:25 are the answer to your fruit of the vine question.. He says, "But I will not drink henceforth of this fruit of the vine, until that day that I drink it new (new wine) with you in my Father's kingdom." We know NEW wine must be put into NEW bottles. Only those in...

Those at the wedding were in the old covenant. Christ was showing them the new covenant by the example of saving the best until last. It means the new covenant was better IN EVERY WAY. Please go back and read the post AGAIN. I have NEVER said or even insinuated that Christ was a gutton...

Biblicist has already cited the Mishnah. Like I said, go back and read SLOWLY.

You asked how the children of Israel could make wine in the wilderness. The question would seem to indicate that you think that they had no access to grapes in order to make wine. Wine grows in what is often hilly and arid land. The children of Isreal in their travels would go thru many lands...

You pervert whether by intention or ignorance what I am saying. Show me where I said anyone was directed to the wedding feast. Go back and READ SLOWLY what I wrote in regard to the wedding feast. Your saying, no it does not, is weak in scriptural defense and understanding.

If you go back and read previous posts, you will see that Biblicist as already answered the question of the fruit of the vine. The mixing of 3 parts water and 1 part wine was/is called the fruit of the vine.

The element of the cup has already been show to you by the example of the wedding feast. What makes you think that the fruit of the vine cannot be wine? EVERYTHING in one way or the other teaches the new covenant. It was what both He and John Baptist came preaching so Christ uses the wedding...

I do NOT believe that Christ was ever drunk so I know they told lies as I have previously pointed out. Nor do I believe that any of the brethren should become drunken. The righteous neighbor knows he is his brother's keeper and even during the wedding feast, they did everything possible to...

The wedding feast and the teaching of communion cannot be separated in that Christ reveals in the wedding feast what is in the cup at the Lord's supper. When he tells Mary his time is not yet come he is not only prophesying about His crucifixion, but also the institution of the Lord's supper...

I used Hosea 4:11 because it is in response to something I believe you posted (I can't seem to currently find it). If it was someone else and not you, I apologize). The author seemed to believe that yayin and tirosh we not alcoholic. Hosea 4:11 proves otherwise.

How could a charge of being a winebibber/drunkard be brought if Christ was drinking grape juice? You have a incorrect correlation in saying that Christ said he came drinking grape juice. Against drinking grape juice they would have no charge thus that drinking grape juice cannot be the point...

Your accusation that I believe that Christ had a devil is a very strong unjustified charge. This is the same as calling me a fool. The scriptures say in Mt 5:22 ..."whosoever shall say, thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire." I have seen this before. People resort to personal attacks...