Search results

Has the gospel message changed? Is the "modern gospel message" any different from the "old gospel message"? I think not. The gospel is the gospel. I think that was simply your way of disparaging me via ad hominem. Now, show me where I said I was against open air preaching. And I can show you...

I vehemently disagree. A missionaries job is to get among the people, to become one of the people. To gain their trust and show them Christ. At times that may mean being confrontational. But standing out in the street and ranting like a mad man is a great way to ostracize people, rather than...

I've heard good things about that. Personally, I use OBS, but I do a lot of screen capture. Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

Also, your software will be different, depending on if you want to be live or pre-recorded. Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

It doesn't take much to get it going. Your computer is going to be the biggest factor, with internet speed a close second if you're broadcasting live. Basically, all you need is a camera and a computer, and you're set. Obviously, there is more equipment to be gotten that can make you look and...

I understand the idea of protecting the quarterback from injury. But in my mind, that's your defenses' job, not the league's. If you don't want your quarterback getting hit hard, train your linemen to protect him. Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

As soon as physical harm is threatened, I would file a restraining order on the man, making it illegal for him to come onto church premises. Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

One of my former soldiers contacted me via Facebook just a bit ago. He referred to me as my rank and name (SGT Presswood). Just wondering how often (if ever) that happens to you guys, and how you feel about it. For me, it was a bit of nostalgia, honestly. Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

That was exactly my point earlier. Of people who think that man can cause global warming, 97.1% of them say that man is. 66.4% of abstracts that addressed global warming did not take a position on AGW. So, in reality, we have 66.4% dissention. Let me break it down this way. Let's say we...

Interesting that you would jump to that conclusion without knowing any of the story. No. I didn't abandon them. There's a whole lot more to the story, but I helped them find another pastor before I left, and the pulpit wasn't empty even one service. Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

Not going to lie. That made me laugh. It's no secret what I believe, and I've even posted in depth what I believe before, a few times. I even outlined it again in a PM to TCassidy today. But for your sake, I'll post it again right here. I believe that man cannot just choose to come to Christ...

And therein lies the contention behind this particular label. It is a misrepresentation (at least, the way that the OP stated it) of what people believe. I am not against labels at all. I am advocating for the disuse of "rejected labels". My very screen name is a label. If someone wanted to...

I'm not responding to the first part of your quote, because it's not my desire to debate the words themselves, only discuss the use of the labels, and how they detract from any meaningful conversation. Your response reinforces my point. If I were to discuss with you what you believed, and...

I typically avoid the Cal/Arm forum because of the toxicity levels, but I feel I have something to add to this conversation. The issue that people take with the labels is that they are, in and of themselves, strawmen. For instance: I don't know of a single Arminian/Non-Cal that has ever said...

Well, not officially, because that's against the board rules I believe. I merely pointed out your dishonesty in saying I was making claims I wasn't making. By definition, it is. By YOUR OWN posted definition, it is. "Disguise" and "costume" are two different things. And deceiving can be used...

Firstly, there you go with your dishonesty again. This discussion cannot continue if you are going to keep doing the wrong thing by accusing me of saying something I'm not saying. It's dishonest, and quite frankly, means you have already lost any debate. Fortunately, I'm more interested in...

The irony is not lost on me here that you are accusing me of doing what you're doing. Obviously, scripture does not contradict each other. But it is a fact that God used deceit with the angels. So, when scripture says "no deceit was found" or something similar, it doesn't mean what you think it...

It obviously was not. Again, God used a literal textbook example of deceit. There is absolutely zero debatability on that. So, your statement is wrong. ALL deceit is not viewed as a lie. Otherwise God lied. "In his mouth" means that He would have deceived by lying. Huge difference. You keep...

Yes. No. What you are doing is being dishonest yourself, and trying to tell me what I believe, rather than tackling the evidence that I've presented to you. Care to do right, instead of doing wrong?

I never said it did. Exactly. And since God used deceit, it must not be wrong. That is my entire point. And there's no debate about whether God used deceit or not. None. The angels made humans think that they, too, were human. That's textbook deceit. Moot point given the above. Non-germane to...