Sapper Woody
Well-Known Member
Well, not officially, because that's against the board rules I believe. I merely pointed out your dishonesty in saying I was making claims I wasn't making.ok, you have accused me of lying.
By definition, it is. By YOUR OWN posted definition, it is.First, wearing a disguise is not automatically deceitful.
Concealing the truth is not automatically deceitful.
"Disguise" and "costume" are two different things.If it were, every child would be condemned by wearing a mask when going trick or treating.
And deceiving can be used as a tool to do right, as God Himself shows us.However, wearing a disguise can be used as a tool to do wrong.
Right. It was necessary to deceive. God deceived, because it's not wrong to do.According to Jeremiah the heart is deceitful above all things,
The angels of God have no such hearts.
They as a child wear a disguise because it is necessary to do the bidding of God.
And what is amazing to me is that you can't even see that YOUR OWN posted definition proves me correct. It really is astounding.I posted from the common dictionary on line source just exactly what deceit means.
I have not been dishonest or broken my integrity in this entire post. You, on the other hand, have accused me over and over again of saying something I did not say. So ... who's being dishonest?That you would decidedly promote what is unfounded and accusing my posts as dishonest, then the readers will need to determine who posts with integrity.
I literally laughed when I read this. I challenge you to read the thread again. If you read it with honest comprehension and searching, you'll see who made the unfounded accusations. Spoiler again: It's you.It is unfortunate that you cannot simply state your case without the unfounded accusations.
As a final note, I notice that you STILL haven't addressed anything I've actually said. Interesting.
Last edited: