Search results

This is sheer FREEMASONRY and ROMAN CATHOLIC RACISM heresy from which Calvinism derived. Since you and a few others want to make every mention of Israel into a "JUDIAZER" issue, then lets include the origins of the Roman Catholic and Masonic influence on Calvinism.

And WHY are they not all Israel?? Who is Paul talking about? "Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel (JACOB):" "Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called...

Your continued bogus crap accusations that I am bringing in some Jewish conspiracy is STUPID and INSULTING. I have admitted that the Jews get the worst end of the deal where the church gets raptured while the nation of Israel faces the music to finish the transgression of Daniel 9:24-27. How is...

A remnant of Israel is not a remnant of the church. That is ludicrous. Israel and the church are NOT THE SAME. There is NEVER one single mention of there being a CHURCH REMNANT. The remnant is clearly explained as a remnant WITHIN ISRAEL. The REMNANT are JEWS from the 12 TRIBES OF ISRAEL. If...

WHOM He foreknow in Romans 8 is not the same "whom He foreknew" in Romans 11:2. Why does Paul make the follow up comment in Romans 9 Hath God cast way HIS PEOPLE which he foreknow? FOR I ALSO AM AN ISRAELITE. Notice the contrast HIS PEOPLE..ISRAELITE. Romans 9 changes in context from Romans...

Again, to you and Biblicist both, notice Paul ends Romans 9:24 with a question mark????? Paul begins this as a hypothetical scenerio with WHAT IF GOD DID THIS? You have taken 3 chapters of clear instruction about Israel and hung on one verse that mentions "us" that was given as a hypothetical...

I never said Israel ONLY, I clearly showed and stated that Paul is making a comparison among Israel as a NATION and the Gentiles AS A WHOLE. But it is clear that the context is ABOUT ISRAEL, it is not ABOUT individuals or Gentiles, but ABOUT the future of Israel and where, if at all, they fit...

* I will get to your statement about the clouds in a little bit. There are some things you are leaving out about groups already in heaven during the tribulation of which no clouds are present. I for one do not rely on the same interpretations of verse that most pre-tribbers use. I am...

No because by "default" you are only permitting that there are 2 options. In the early 1500s, the popular debate was between Luther's version against free will, and the Catholic Erasmus argument for free will. So does that mean by default anyone that disagreed with Luther (which many Calvinists...

Read post 112 I have answered this SEVERAL times. You isolate one verse that says "and also of the GENTILES" and fail to see that Romans 9-11 is a comparison of the gospel being given to the Gentiles AS A WHOLE compared to the NATION OF ISRAEL being set aside and then again being "risen from the...

Part 2

. THE BIBLICIST I have already debated this with Archangel and several others to show that such an interpretation of Greek is erroneous to imply that dia is always used as a means of instrumentality as opposed to en (not eis). And the accusative case of eis has NOTHING to do with the last half...

Thanks for trying. I can't find anything either. What I am concerned about is the constant revisitation and revival of James Whites accusations against Ergun Caner for his discrenpencies and his accusations that Norman Geisler is purposely covering them up. Regardless of what Caner did or did...

And yet another perfect example of a summary dismissal without any effective explanation as to how the content fits the definition of an argument that YOU CREATED (argument about your wife). Here, let me help you argue your own case, and then perhaps I'll have a meaningful debate with MYSELF...

Your replies in red are merely a repeat of the same thing that I've already answered in several DIFFERENT ways. Your denial of the scriptures are simply" "Nope, thats not true" "see above" "same as before" "That's not true" "That isn't true either" "I know you are but what am I" "I'm rubber...

You are being inconsistent in your own theology. God doesn't "elect" in the Calvinist system based upon what anyone DESERVES which even you admit that standard is applied to those He "elects" to eternal life. If election therefore is not based upon what is DESERVED, that would equally apply to...

Rich Young Ruler Mark 10:21: "ὁ δὲ Ἰησοῦς ἐμβλέψας αὐτῷ ἠγάπησεν αὐτὸν καὶ εἶπεν αὐτῷ Ἕν σοί ὑστερεῖ ὕπαγε ὅσα ἔχεις πώλησον καὶ δὸς τοῖς πτωχοῖς καὶ ἕξεις θησαυρὸν ἐν οὐρανῷ καὶ δεῦρο ἀκολούθει μοι ἄρας τὸν σταυρόν" The highlighted word is AGAPE (egapesen from agapeo). By all accounts, the...

There are some presuppositions in your post that are not accurate from a Biblicist point of view. What was elected in 2 Thes 2:13 was not salvation but the MEANS of salvation: through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth. Yet if God predetermines a select group of people...

I can give you quote after quote from Calvinist themselves that show Calvinists do not believe in volitional freedom. And yet you contradict yourself when you say that Calvinists actually DO believe in volitional freedom and in the same breath ask to be shown where contra-casual freedom is...

You forgot your fallacy of dodging the obvious: WHERE IS THE WORD OF GOD? And you claim the KJVO is a "man-made" myth, but yet your textual criticism is a science based on the made-made theories developed by Westcott & Hort. A large quotient of sources you obtain your information from are...