Search results

I would have thought you could make at least one truthful statement in 4 sentences. But no. Like most hateful rants, truth takes a backseat to the hate.

Yes. He's on the judiciary committee. If he votes with democrats , no nominees ever come out of committee to be voted on by the full Senate.

One source I saw said they were not wearing body cams. Even the police chief has his doubts about using a pre dawn raid to confiscate the weapon. Said Anne Arundel County police chief Timothy Altomare: "If you look at this morning’s outcome, it’s tough for us to say, “Well, what did we...

Flake is refusing to vote to confirm any more judges unless legislation protecting the Mueller witch hunt is passed. Trump hater to the end.

And that won't happen until the RINO from Arizona is gone, according to him.

Wouldn't it be funny if she played the race card on Pelosi backers?:D

It's going to happen with or without Pelosi. Nadler is a rabid dog and he wants nothing more than to harrass the Trump administration. Look for constant investigations and subpoenas galore from the House judicial committee. He will definitely kill all investigations into the corruption of the...

Everyone is afraid to run against her. If they lose , they know she will consign them to the siberia of committee assignments. They would rather have a speaker that is obviously in the beginning stages of dementia, so much so that she can hardly construct a complete sentence without going off...

Which other rights are "people of good conscience" willing to give up, or more precisely, take away from others and keep for themselves? Do you want to repeal the 2nd, 4th, and 5th Amendments completely? Or just obey them when it's convenient? There are plenty of left wing radicals that...

Understood. But I don't think they care.

I don't believe it will matter if your weapons are seized in Maryland. They don't intend to ever give them back to you unless you have a LOT of money, enough to sue to get them back after you use a ton of money to prove you are not dangerous or incompetent.

This isn't just the "way I see it". This is the way it is. It's already codified. It's the law. If they have a credible complaint, they notify the respondent either by arrest, if they have probable cause, or summons to appear in court whenever, if they don't. If he doesn't show, they issue...

No they don't. They deliberately crafted the law to do an end run around the 4th Amendment in order to destroy the 2nd amendment They knew exactly what they were doing. They don't care how many rights they violate, they want the guns.

Absolutely. By following the constitution.

Trying to attach today's labels to Christ is an impossible task, but people keep trying. Jesus was one of a kind. There have been none other like him and there never will be. "Seek ye first the Kingdom of God" is hardly a call for "globalism."

To get what he wanted and to cover up his crimes.

An irrational argument argument for sure. You can't have it both ways. This law is a clear violation of the 2nd, 4th, and 5th Amendments and you're OK with that. A man who committed no crime to bring police to his door at 5:17 AM is dead. And you're OK with that. Got it. One question: Who...

Acosta wouldn't shut up long enough for her to be heard.

In the mean time, how many people will have their personal property confiscated based on an unknown complaint by an unknown person and how many more will die in the process? Next time it might be the police officers ...and there will be a next time.