Search results

An innocent man is dead. You couldn't find a better case to make the argument that the law is unconstitutional. He's just the first. There will be more. Next time , it may be a law enforcement officer that dies attempting to enforce an unconstitutional law.

He would also still be alive if the officers hadn't been there to make an unconstitutional gun grab. He would also be alive if the constitution had been followed in the first place. It is the people that wrote the law that do not trust the constitution and since they can't change the...

It is not against the law to own a gun. Who declared him "mentally disturbed"? The answer is, no one. If they had, the news reports would have said so and the police never made that statement, either. The law is unconstitutional. If due process was followed, an innocent man would still be...

How do we know? We don't know who it was or what the complaint is and if that person was "wronged" at all. It could be he just didn't like the defendent so decide the way to get back at him was to file a bogus complaint. And since the defendent wasn't allowed to answer the complaint before...

I give up. You just can't read.

No. It isn't. Was the defendant at the hearing? Did he have a chance to answer the complaint before having his constitutional rights taken away? That's how due process works.

But it should, since the one who was first wronged is dead. Who do we see about that one?

I'm not going to do your homework for you. All you have to do is read the article. You've got it wrong on almost every point.

False, he did commit a crime in resisting the officers. . So resisting arrest brought them to his door? Really? In addition to that, they weren't there to arrest him. Some critical reading skills seem to missing here.

Then you obviously can't read. Your statement is still false. Almost nothing about it is true.

You're so off base that it's probably useless to ask you what crime he might have committed that gave them probable cause to be at his door. I remind you that owning a gun is not against the law. Thsi ought to be fun. Especially since you haven't bothered to correct the false statements you...

The officers shouldn't have been there. That's the whole point. He shouldn't have to go to court to have his constitutional right restored when it shouldn't have been taken away without a hearing FIRST. Now a man who committed no crime to bring them to his door is dead.

That is a false statement. I let it go the first time, but I'm calling you out this time.

Simple. You follow the Constitution. A complaint was filed. A hearing is scheduled to see if the defendant is, in fact a danger to himself or others. If it is determined he is, his firearms can be confiscated. He has a Constitutional right to own firearms. That right may not legally be...

Man, you are way out there. You really ought to just put it away. You haven't said anything yet that is either right or made any sense.

I believe so, but he's not the only one. And Gov. Moonbeam has blamed Trump.

One thing we can absolutely count on in a Florida recount in Broward County...Democrats will cheat. Florida recount efforts underway in multiple races: What to know about the process Brenda Snipes, Broward County’s supervisor of elections, has long been the target of complaints from...

MAGA Trying out for Christian drama queen now, I see. "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." Not that of the UK or...

Of course Macron's boorish behavior is being overlooked entirely by the haters. What kind of a leader says these kinds of thing when an allied head of state is about to visit? "In a radio interview last Tuesday, Macron called for Europe to raise “a true European army,” to defend against the...

Causing you, a self professed Christian, to demonstrate the worst about yourself. Pity you can't see that.