Search results

This is because YOU ASSUMED that I said the KJV is THE ONLY Bible, which I did NOT say, I said it is the preserved word of God IN ENGLISH. You insert your own words into my statement by claiming that because I said IN ENGLISH, that I said ONLY IN ENGLISH. That misconception is YOUR FAULT, not...

Will Kinney- Godhead or Deity - Is James White Right? Colossians 2:8-9 "Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, aftr the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ. For in him dwelleth all the fulness of THE GODHEAD bodily."...

The Aramaic was translated into Hebrew and Greek so no I didn't leave it out. And considering that English is my SECOND language, it's pretty foolish for you to presume that what I call THE Bible means a particular version in English, although yes, I do believe that the particular version IN...

You just bootstrapped the Peshitta on to my claim that the modern versions rely on the critical text. All of the versions you just sited were attempts to update the KJV, and you know full well that's not what I mean by "Modern Versions". The entire line of Syriac versions hardly agree with any...

I just gave you my answer. I am not in that crowd that believes the sales of the KJV prove it's veracity. I agree that's it's preservation is proof, but God has preserved ALL of the Bible through the Greek as well as Hebrew from their inception to the KJV for ENGLISH. You are still trying to...

Did the 7th Day Adventists of his day agree with Wilkinson? No they did not. Do they even today agree with him? No they do not. There is a huge difference in using FEW quotes from Wilkinson that he quoted from someone else, where those who used SOME of his resources were quoting his findings...

Go back and read my responses in post 28 and 29. Lucifer was not a "transliteration" and those who say otherwise do not know what they are talking about, and have no understanding of how languages work.

You (and Doug Kutilek) are taking these quotes entirely out of context. When the KJV translators did their work, they have thousands of manuscripts from the Majority Text available and the other texts they had were used to compare to the Erasmus text which was a complete compilation. The KJV...

Your main 2 questions are silly: 1. Prove that the KJV is infallible 2. Do KJVO believe God caused the NIV to sell. First of all, the burden of proof is on the accuser. You expect someone to write on a small comment in a forum, something that covers 31,000 verses, and 5,000+ manuscripts...

So in other words, you're saying that David Kutilek quoted YOU, instead of you copying word for word his articles from his website. :thumbs: Gotcha! Your response here, without even quoting anything from Wilkinson books that shows the connection other than you SAYING these are Wilkinson...

I will give a thorough response to this later but you still have not shown any connection between where the KJVOs cited Wilkinson, and the specific portions of what they cited being wrong. Nevertheless, what is ironic is that KJVO are accused of virtually plagiarizing Wilkinson, when the same...

I have rebutted this in post 28. But to claim that "anyone who knows Hebrew" misunderstands this is crazy. Hebrew is my native language and there's not one person in Israel that would agree with you on this. Of course we wouldn't call it "Lucifer" in Hebrew, because we're speaking Hebrew, and...

Once again, this is totally wrong. Translation is not based on how something sounds and certainly isn't based on transliteration. Transliteration is using the same letters that are equivalent in English as they are from another language. For example, where you spelled out the Greek name for...

Yes Satan used the Bible against Jesus, but Jesus didn't respond with philosophical reasoning and emotional arguments, He responded with Scripture and quoted it correctly. This comment is based on pure emotionalist logic. The Bible says otherwise.

Again, there is no solid proof that just because a few KJVO's sited Wilkinson that they relied on his work solely to support a KJVO position. The fallacy in this argument is that: 1. You are playing the same guilt by association game when none of the KJVO critics admit in the modern...

KJVOs do not advocate that Burgon ever thought the 18th century version of the TR was perfect, but that he opposed all of the manuscripts used by Westcott and Hort and primarily the Alexandrian text. What Burgon had criticized was the CURRENT form of the TR that had no longer been in major use...

P4T is actually right for once: "And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth: and the dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born........And the great dragon was cast out, that old...

You still don't get it. You are not applying the same standards to Lucifer and you should be applying to the names of everyone else. John is not John in Greek or Hebrew. James is not James in Greek or Hebrew. Jesus is not Jesus in Greek or Hebrew. God is not God in Greek or Hebrew. And you...

Thirded :):thumbs: The problem is in how the OP defines "cooperate". If cooperate is meant to imply that God has half of a necklace that has saving power, and we have the other half that also contains some kind of saving power and connect them together, then yes, cooperation is erroneous...

Plants never had choices, that is an erroneous analogy.