Search results

Maurice Robinson explains the case for the Byzantine Text. The full interview.

Only 5 minutes and some odd seconds long.

William Tyndale's 1534 revised edition. � 2:1 And it chaunced in thoose dayes: that ther went oute a comaundment from Auguste the Emperour that all the woorlde shuld be taxed. 2:2 And this taxynge was the fyrst and executed when Syrenius was leftenaunt in...

William Tyndale's Translations, Miles Coverdale's Translations, Matthew's Bible, the Great Bible, Bishops Bible and Geneva Bibles are all like the KJV, because the King James Version was made from these Bibles.

So then the Holman Christian Standard Bible is different than the Christian Standard Bible. Thank you.

Isn't this the Bible that was suppose to use the Byzantine Majority Text but switched after someone died, either a main backer or Translator to Nestle/Aland?

William Tyndale compares, since he translated in 1526, 1530, revised 1534, 35-36. The King James Translators were wise to take so much from William Tyndales translation into their own.

Why? Shakespeare is not Middle ages, or Dark ages. Shakespeare is Early Modern English. William Tyndale 1526 is Early Modern English. Wycliffe is medieval English and Anglo-Saxon might be considered Dark Ages.

Impossible.

Or you could just watch the short video and comment on any part that you wished. I like how he sqashes the telephone game comparison to how actual scribes really worked instead.

Excellent point. If the Original Text is not in the "Text", it will be in the footnotes. So the complete Original Text will be in the NKJV whether in the Text or Notes.

The New King James Version is a revision of the KJV Alan. Never believe anything David Daniels says. He is a false witness and does not know what he is talking about. Now there is a Fine scholar named David Daniels that writes about William Tyndale, and has produced a modern spelling edition of...

The NKJV is a revision of the KJV. And it is beyond dispute that the NKJV used the Textus Receptus Version of the Greek Text. The Original KJV used multiple editions of the Textus Receptus as well as other editions. Proof? https://www.bible-researcher.com/received.html

And yet they have no proof whatsoever.

The Majority manuscripts were copied first second third fourth fifth and so on and so fourth until the10th 11th 12th, 13th centuries. High quality copying. The earlier one's were copied early but they were so poor no one copied them. At least they did not leave any ancestors. Remember. When...

Or an * or ° ○● or some other Symbol?

There are many books in the KJV. Before the KJV in 1611, there was William Tyndale in the early 1500's. The KJV Translators mostly used his translations, as did Coverdale, the Great Bible, Matthew's, Geneva. https://www.tyndale.org/

Copied from Google Ai Examples of Early Modern English literature include Shakespeare's plays like Hamlet and Romeo and Juliet, Spenser's The Faerie Queene, and Milton's Paradise Lost. Other representative works are the King James Bible, Donne's metaphysical poems, and philosophical texts like...