Search results

If YEC is true, why did God create the the solar system to be a virtual shooting gallery? It fits the science model of how the Solar System was formed. It does not make sense in the context of a Solar System blinked into existence and perfect order within a couple days. There is no need for...

Do you have an example of eohippus reproducing with a modern horse? I'd love to read about it. Environmental adaptation is evolution. Your moth example is flawed. It is the most common flaw in understanding of evolution. There is no clear dividing line in speciation. Any healthy member of a...

Wow that is a massive leap. Especially since fermentation wasn't understood until around 1857. That wine was allowed to oxidize. And I sure wouldn't want to drink ancient wine as in Proverbs 23; In the end it bites like a snake and poisons like a viper. 33 Your eyes will see strange...

Compressing atoms? Then they stop being atoms. See a neutron star.

Please find any personal insults in this quote. "So in other words, no explanation, no evidence. God of the Gaps fallacy." I'd love to have one pointed out. As far as your 1995 article, I was unable to find it. But you are way out of date. There have been more recent research on that in...

No. Unlike you, I am not asserting there was some time where universal laws were altered temporarily, without any evidence backing thar assertion. And it isn't uniform. That is not what a half life means. It is an average. There is a few percent variance. Negligible when we are talking about...

I know plenty about YEC. And well... it is untentable.

Agreed. That is why science keeps.. well.. evolving. It is why the scientific process does not allow any claim to be admitted without being attacked. Sometimes it takes decades for an idea to be accepted as evidence is found to match the predictions. There is no evidence supporting YEC.

You're making an unfounded leap in reasoning. If Genesis were to be taken literal it brings another issue regarding the creation of Eve. If an actual rib was removed from Adam to create Eve, Adam minus a rib, would no longer be perfect.

Europe is far more atheistic than the US, well excluding the Muslim immigrants. The issue isn't that Genesis is a lie. Ok for some it is. For others, it is that YEC have a faulty interpretation. It takes ignoring a mountain of evidence while accepting as fact an interpretation made by...

There is a Sumerian kings list written 1200 years before Genesis that claims long lifespan of kings. Likely influenced the author of Genesis during Babylonian captivity.

I cannot help but see hilarious irony in some of these arguments. How can one attack scientists for incomplete knowledge of the universe by throwing out conjecture like, well maybe the universal laws were different in the past, when there is absolutely no evidence for said conjecture...

" “the long lifespans attributed to these antediluvian patriarchs have a symbolic rather than a historical value. Babylonian tradition also recorded ten kings with fantastically high ages who reigned successively before the flood.” - footnote in the New American Bible

There is absolutely no data that supports a young universe.

Do you have any shred of evidence there has been a "change underlying fundamental conditions"? Or are you arguing from ignorance to try to discredit what existing evidence does show?

If Adam & Eve sinned but before hand they already had offspring, those offspring would have to have sinned as well. If they remained faithful then would they not be alive today?

Do you have evidence supporting this claim? DNA wasn't even discovered until the 20th century.

It is bizarre that you think answering a question with a question, then wondering why I don't respond to that question says a lot. Especially when your question is a red herring.

The rate of decay has been measured from extraterrestrial sources such as the Moon. Unless you think the alleged global flood also covered the moon, your argument is nonsense.

So in other words, no explanation, no evidence. God of the Gaps fallacy.