Search results

The post I quoted and responded to originally was post #41 which apparently unbeknownst to the author was actually describing evolution.

Ok? What is that supposed to mean and how is it relevant to the discussion other than you fishing for an ad hominem?

Lol. Thank chart is only to illustrate the common ancestor of chimps and man and to follow the lineage of man. It isn't to follow the lineage of chimpanzees. I am not sure if you are just being ignorant or purposefully deceitful.

Aristotle believed the Earth was eternal. James Hutton blew away the belief in a 6000 year old Earth a century before Darwin.

Come on. That is nonsense. How would Adam & Eve even understood the warning then if they had not seen death already? Considering the reproductive rate of insects, the Garden of Eden would have been overran.

Red herring. That is not the topic of discussion and only serves to provide a distraction.

The 7 days in Genesis relate ONLY to creation. That is not at all implying God has done nothing else. It is implying that God has done no further creation. If you can cite new examples of creation done since, please do so. If one forces a literal view then it becomes nonsensical. The Bible...

Red herring fallacy. The discussion is the provided example of eohippus evolving into modern horses while denying that is evolution.

How about we first disperse with logical fallacies by not resorting to red herrings and stick to the the discussion on this thread? In this thread, we have an example provided of the evolution of horses through natural selection, though perplexingly that example was stated to not be evolution...

There is the real definition of biological evolution, from biologists who study evolution. Then there are definitions created by those who either have a poor understanding of evolution or alter it on purpose to be deceitful. The examples given earlier were biological evolution in action.

You don't get to change the definition of evolution to suit your beliefs. Evolution is simply the change in a gene pool of a population over time. The example given was just that. Evolution. The fundamental evolutionary event is a change in the frequency of genes and chromosome configurations...

Nor did you answer mine.

For the rate of decay to change the physical laws of the universe would have to change. What evidence is there this ever happened?

I'm asking a question. It is easy to attack evolutionists and say they don't have evidence for every idea they have. Creationists have to answer the same type of question about their beliefs or they have little ground to stand upon. The most important is what evidence is there God wrote the...

False dichotomy. I reject the notion the creation event was 6 literal days. Psalm 95 and Hebrews 4 both show that God is still in his 7th day of rest. Clearly this shows that there were not 6 literal 24-hour days of creation.

Humans and dinosaurs never coexisted. Dinosaurs have been extinct for ~65 million years.

You just described evolution.

You actually just described evolution.

Lol. Radiometric Dating Does Work!

What evidence do you have the Bible is God's word?