Search results

Do you want to answer the question properly or are you going to persist with your puerile reply

The fact that you've had to stoop to the Daily Heil Online tells me all I need to know. I can't even be bothered to access that putrid organ

More misinformation. Nothing in your post is true.

I will accept that as a compliment as I know many very good people including good Christians who work for the NHS and have to deal with a great deal of strife from chronic underfunding by the Tories to fund tax cuts for their rich cronies to the sort of ignorance very difficult cases such as...

If the artificial feeding through a tube in the stomach is part and parcel of prolonging his life artificially when his brain has ceased to function, yes. We can hook someone up to a machine who's brain dead and keep their body going theoretically indefinitely by such methods. Doesn't mean we...

Just be careful with who you get pally with: in the 1980s the Iranians were the Bad Guys so we cosied up to Saddam as he was fighting them....and look where that got us

I'm OK with letting a dying child for whom nothing further can be done die a natural death with dignity rather than try to resist God's will

No, haven't you got the memo: it's one rule for States We Like and quite another for State We Don't Like

Nope, wrong again: providing nourishment and ventilation to a person who is basically all but brain dead and cannot breathe unaided for any length of time is artificially keeping them alive. Got it yet?

No, but they stop artificially keeping them alive at that point. Same with Alfie. So, bad luck but quite a sensible question in fact, which you I note you have still failed to answer.

ER question to you again then. Answer that first and then we'll talk about Alfie

The difference is that the judge was willing to be guided by the evidence. The parents weren't and neither it seems are you. Yes, I've got that. When will you?

No-one's killed anyone. Tell me, when you watch an episode of 'ER' and they're in the recovery room and someone says "I think we should stop now", do you jump up and point your finger at the screen shouting "Murderers!"?

I've explained already to you how it works: the Court's medical expert witnesses guide the judge. They are medically qualified. It you can't read/ can't be bothered to read what I've put in plain English then, sorry, but I can't help you

Sorry, missed the memo that said that threats to kill and rape medical staff weren't 'real crimes'. Your post makes me sick. It really makes me want to vomit.

Only if you agree that JWs and African Penties have the same rights over their children...

Utter. Utter. Hogwash.

The Court experts - for all sides - were medically qualified. All were unanimous in their conclusion. The judge was guided by their finds of fact. Really, how difficult is this to follow?

Sorry, Carpro, but we have this thing called EVIDENCE. You might want to acquaint yourself with the concept.

No whining. Just the truth