Search results

Doesn't negate what I wrote -- because what I wrote was an opening, an invitation to discuss the tract and what it says. You know, like Philip asking the Ethiopian if he understood what he was reading, and the Ethiopian saying "how can I unless some man should guide me?" So I'd really like to...

Evan - post #42, please.

Doesn't scripture say that God so loved the world that He gave His only son; that through Him, we might be saved? Is that not Jesus loving us? Isn't that the message on the tracts you pass out? Doesn't Jesus love us so much that He sacrificed Himself on the cross for us? So what I said was NOT...

Can't just say "wrong." Please tell me what was wrong, and why.

Depends on how cold it is. ;) Pass them out, with the message "Jesus loves you, and has a message for you. Happy to tell you more."

Gentlemen - let us not forget that some circles make a distinction regarding ceremonial law....

People seem to not realize that the original Night of the Living Dead was a social commentary on every-day life; how, instead of eating brains and flesh, the allegory was about our society sucking the life from our souls, and each member who conformed would then "turn" another.... Or maybe it...

Evan - I think the question being posed to you is, there are many other parts of the law that might/could/should(?) be considered moral law; for example, man lying with man as he would a woman; or lying with beasts. Aren't these also moral laws? In the Matthew 5 passages you referenced, look at...

Still waiting on you to address *any* of the questions I posed at the beginning of this thread....

It wasn't a comparison of anyone to Ruckman. It was a statement that anyone can use scripture to justify their position; that's why you should discuss the scripture and its application to evangelism, rather than the book. Your knee-jerk response is an indication of hero-worship. Give it some...

And yet, you haven't answered any of my questions from the first page, have you? At least Zaac tried....

Things that aren't explicitly stated can be, and should be, challenged in the legal system. That also means a LOT of taxpayer money used to defend the EO. My first response is, how many other things has the Attorney General's office, throughout the years of our country, didn't think were flawed...

I believe John of Japan said "easy to defend from Scripture"; yet, your first response is "I'll dig out a book." I'm sure your book uses scripture to defend its premise; there are lots of books that use scripture to defend their premise. Peter Ruckman used a LOT of scripture in his books to...

Well...no responses. No supporters of the EO can apparently provide answers to my questions. Not surprised. Just disappointed.

I think I know what you mean, but would you clarify?

CTB - what makes the background checks in this EO "more serious" than the background checks already being done? Which mass shooting would have been prevented by any of the measures in this EO? How exactly will this EO protect us?

Zaac - please see post #13.

If I collected some, or a dozen, or even 100 handguns; then a year or two later I decide I no longer want them, and I really don't want guns any more at all; so I decide to sell the entire lot to a collector I know--am I required to obtain a seller's license?

"Anyone selling a gun basically be licensed to do so." That directly contradicts "if you're in the business of selling firearms." This is where the EO is vague, and therefore useless. Define "in the business of selling." Does that mean they have to be declared as a business? If that's the...

Yeah, and the gunshot microphone records are supposed to be destroyed every 24 hours, too.