Search results

But are current sins an excuse to express hated for a president for doing the same things previous ones did without such hartred?

Nobody needs or wants a history lesson here. Some boy from a crustacean hamlet claimed he was talking about individual Christians, but he complained about social services and borders and the election-- that government is not Marxist enough.

This one and a bunch of others.

Then why was the election of Trump referred to? And borders ; the international kind? and social services? And immigration policies? 're these what #individual# Christians execute? .No, the OP was much about government. So again: should our government govern by the Bible?

That obviously leaves the question: why the cross if there is some other way to be saved?

I've always like how Col. Travis answered Santa Anna's messenger who presented the ultimatum of either surrendering the Alamo or being stormed with no quarters-- a cannon shot.

Maybe Jesus didn't have to offend the Pharisees and tell stories which painted them as wicked men, but he did it. So did his disciples. Meanwhile, old Joe Kennedy pandering to the nazis to keep the USA out of the war-- and, of course, his sons alive and well to bask in privilege and screw...

In that case, is the Executive Order to detain travelers from certain muzzlimm countries "common sense?" If not, how many American lives blasted or blooded to death do you consider a fair number to keep up that American image of taking in anybody?

Ain't that dangerous thinking? So we deal with foreign governments according to the majority religion of the countries? That's just a second way of prejudging them.

Then will Holocaust Remembrance Day increase the risk for nazis to commit violence or vandalism?

Yes or No: Should our government govern by the Bible?

Does the truth hurt?

Did muzzlumms not viciously attack America that day?

Then acknowledging 9-11 as The Day Muslims Viciously Attacked America would not be prohibiting the free exercise of religion?

He CAN prohibit the free exercise of religion, or he CAN'T respect an establishment of religion?

So he can't prohibit the free exercise of religion, but he can respect an establishment of religion?

He can't issue an Executive Order banning a particular religion, but he is expected to mention a particular religion/ethnicity on a day of remembrance?

"Deadly Attacks Since 9/11" it says. If this done for 15 years what would those numbers be? If you want to tabulate something similar for the number American troops killed in foreign lands, you could do it since Vietnam, or since WWII, if you want to fudge the numbers for more extended time...

I don't think so, but that's another gospel somersault. Moses was not perfect, unquestionably. So there had to be a sacrifice-- a shedding of blood sacrifice-- without which thee is no forgiveness for sins. Then in Hebrews 10 it is made clear that animal sacrifices could never atone for sin, but...