Search results

This whole country came to a screeching halt, didn't it?

I didn't know honey attracted vinegar at all.

They must have, since they were "men" but didn't have ..... (or did they start manufacturing them that way eventually?)

Many times on atheist/secularist/SC&S boards I have presented a hypothetical situation like this in response to someone claiming we must have "absolute separation of church and state." They always relent on restricting churches and their programs, though of course they will never admit I am...

Trump must be the first president since Lincoln who was elected to office and had a significant portion of the country declare he is not their president, and took violent exception to him. Ain't that innerstin?

Then how about comparing Nehemiah's wallbuilding to the USA's? That's an even comparison; both in this world, for physical defense, to avert what they bring in with them.

What is a fundamentalist? An old man losing his mind who still likes to party.

How many more votes does he th I.k that will grab for him?

I thought nearly all Baptist churches were nonprophet organizations.

"Perhaps to get them on the voting rolls." Yeah. He should have dropped the "Perhaps."

"Audios?" LOL

As I said, anti-Trump. If anti-Obama demonstrators did such things as the current anti-presidents are doing, is anarchists what you would call them? Or fascists? nazis? revolutionaries?....

And are those who oppose him such as they smash windows, burn cars, pepper spray people in the face, set a girl's hair on fire, and beat up a kid for wearing a a MAGA cap?

Probably. Ask a certain crab. [And it should be affects, with an A.]

Can one be pro-liberty and anti-Trump? http://ijr.com/2017/02/795979-pro-trump-kid-gets-beaten-up-for-wearing-maga-hat-to-school-guess-who-the-school-punished/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=owned&utm_campaign=ods&utm_term=ijamerica&utm_content=politics

No. Do you?

I suppose that's "affirmative action," limiting certain benefits to minorities of some kind. Regardless, it is not a blanket "muzzlumm ban" as was stated. Arguably, those who seek asylum may be religious minorities in the sense that they are persecuted by the 'authorities' for nonacceptance...

The obvious question: since virtually all Saudis are muzzlumm, and Saudi Arabia is not, as you said, on the list, then how is religion a "litmus test of immigrants coming here?

That Sherman pile of (%&* does rather look like Bill Bellyache, doesn't he?

Off the top of your head? He cut off the whole head.