Search results

Okay, okay, here's a youtube link of the Gathering of Eagles, now will you leave me alone?: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JdPKMXVePJc http://www.flickr.com/photos/39049221@N00/ Just a bunch of pictures! 'coz Rush Limbaugh says so.

My turn! My turn! You won't understand because you're a [personal attack deleted]. MSM press coverage of the Gathering of Eagles was worse than even usual: http://www.rep-am.com/story.php?id=21057 There was an anti-war protest in Portland the other day...

"Stating a whole lot of nothing" sometimes equals concession. Forget it. In all fairness, maybe they don't tell CIA agents if they're covert when they're covert: http://yargb.blogspot.com/2007/03/transcript-of-plame-testimony.html Plames isn't a lawyer, by the way.

There you go again - "or" excludes, substitute it the word "and". WaPo is "obscure"??? You wanted Toesning's explanation of why Plame wasn't covert, the article told you that. Substitue "and" for "or". She didn't meet the criteria for "covert" by the definition of the criteria...

Well, why doesn't Kinky Friedman run for president? The best thing about Fred Thompson is only that he's not Rudy Giuliani: http://www.firstcoastnews.com/news/florida/news-article.aspx?storyid=78083 No, no and no. Somewhat better...

Between Plame and Toensing? Between someone who claims "once covert, always covert" and someone who co-wrote a law that says otherwise? Not really, she's writing an op/ed piece.... A reference to Fitzgerald? But who's about to rot away in jail? Because Plame's status didn't apply in...

"And", not "or", both conditions must be met, Toensing. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/16/AR2007021601705_pf.html More explicitly:

Dramatic exit, she wanted to bail, how does that indicate "a slant"? She started it in post #3..."mild sarcasm", she defines it for me, then "pathetic and pretty ridiculous", make comments like that, it's lighting the fire. I ignore, the OP (I do apologize to you, tinytim) answers, then...

Eventually, this was going to get to page three, but I have to go, so you're going to get your way again. What am I talking about? You. See, the reasons I think what I think about you are by your attitude towards anybody that you happen to disagree with. When you make "satires" as you do...

What? Off of another forum, I never double-checked it if that's what you mean. Did he say that?

I still don't think he's THAT pretty. I'll just use this thread: from someone of your intellect, eh? in your superior judgment, O Tolerant One. More liberal condescendation...I know the two words "hit piece"! No, that's what you think we should be focusing on. So preachy...

Pastor Larry has better questions.... This isn't the only message board and it's not too hard to guess what Rush Limbaugh would say in this or any situation. Do you want me to listen to him? If so, why?

Well, what's the question? I've probably been to his website four times in the last year, and the last time I heard his radio show in its entirety was when I was driving across NE, IA, and CO six years ago, he was complaining then about the drive-by media. So, NO, there's the answer...

Can you answer my questions for me? I'll try to answer yours: I'll straight up and tell you that I think your overestimate RL's influence and you sometimes seems paranoid about him. He's not broadcasted all over the country, this is a very rural area, most talk radio is not available. It's...

Again, can you tell me why come she told Joe Wilson that she worked for the CIA on their first date and why she told Congress that she wasn't officially covered by the statue to protect covert agents? Or.....why won't Armitage will be charged for this?

Again, can you tell me why come she told Joe Wilson that she worked for the CIA on their first date and why she told Congress that she wasn't officially covered by the statue to protect covert agents?

Lol, as if this means one single thing coming from. You'll reject any "evidence" that you could be wrong about anything anytime. You're smarter, you're better, you're more educated, ...just keep telling yourself that. Gotta reinforce those delusions, ya know.

Easy. You call your little hit job "satire" then turn around and cry when someone you like gets attacked at all. I'd ask you what you'd think if I made THAT "film" about Clinton, but you'd just go into deeper denial.

So you do think he's pretty, "Bro. Curtis"? GW was hitting on Obama. You like to roll your eyes, Edwards likes to brush his hair. No, not if I say so, he's written the books whether I say so or not. I don't really care, but you're right here - dirty campaigning and media distortions are...

What do you mean, "sarcastic"? That Barack Hussein Obama was being insincere, that he really thinks John Edwards isn't pretty? I thought he was trying to hit on John Edwards, then I thought it was probably more political posturing. He make the remarks twice, that's no accdient. Barack...