Search results

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2400288/Paula-Deen-SHOOTS-Trayvon-Martin-new-SVU-episode.html#ixzz2cnq0lAtT The above is, well ------ We DO need a smilie for barfing; which would suit very well here.

At last a glimmer of hope; although I am seriously doubtful that the Rs will ever allow someone this conservative to ever get any great amt of influence with the present leadership. All this seems a little "unreal" with the calibre of nominees the last two elections; almost 'pears that the Rs...

When one says that the word rejects ANY alcohol consumption, but cannot cite any scripture to verify this, IMHO they are getting awfully close to "ADDING" to the word. Mighty dangerous ground regardless of how you personally feel about the topic.

Fer once I agree with Crabby! '12 was a perfect example (well, '08 also) of the GOP snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. To be perfectly honest, both we so dumb it looked pre-planned.:sleeping_2:

With the obvious lack of any real "political" intelligence demonstrated by the public ('08, and '12 especially), I have absolutely no doubt that Biden could win. A lack of knowledge is repairable, but stupidity IS NOT - usually anyway.

I'll say Zaac is tops in one thing, check out his impersonation of an ECHO!:tongue3:

I would say that this has a tremendous potential for fraud; far more than what we have now.

Sorta like Oprah and "the purse", no? :laugh: :1_grouphug:

Gotta be one of those " hates the poor" conservatives that Crabby talks about. Can't think of any other reason he would want to toot his horn about his past "opportunities"!;)

Crabby: "Sag, read my first line in the OP. Just trying to average out the negative Obama ... and often very dishonest ... posts with a negative GOP post. If those folk continue to clog the BB with always Obama posts I figure the opposite not out of line." Crabby, you would do well to respond...

Can't answer for anyone but me, but I do not make it a point to record the names of, in this case scientists, that run their spiels on documentaries. I have watched hundreds of hours through the years and am unable to NAME a single contributor to any of them. This covers earth, forests, sea...

"This guy was funny. Like it or not." Just like all the whiney responses from whiney liberals!

I would guess at least 15 or 20; maybe more!:sleep:

Amazing how one's own words can/will sneak up and bite one's posterior, is it not?? :laugh:

There is no doubt that the inmates have taken over the asylum! I can just see the female RR having to install urinals because of the "crowded" conditions-------! Such is the result of liberalism (today's political version) and insanity. (Sorry, didn't mean to repeat myself:laugh: )

My class is older adult couples in the (approximately) 58-78 range. We have 4 regular teachers plus one who only teaches on a 5th Sunday. (This one also teaches an even older class once a month.) Each one has a totally different style of teaching that varies from none to 3 or 4...

Well, I thought there was some restriction to using photos of RECOGNIZABLE folk sans a written/signed release. 'Course a "public" figure waives that right by virtue of being a "public" entity, but private citizens & families in their own home?????? A well placed pellet round into a camera...

This yokel should be executed by firing squad - with ammo dipped in pig blood!!!

Typical liberal tactic; redirect the conversation when they can't logically answer! (Boy, do they ever give rabbit trails a pounding!:laugh:)

Gina, you are usually pretty rational in your arguments. On this thread you seem to be taking a cue from the liberals by misquoting what was actually written. It's as if this an unusually personal & emotional concern for you. Hope you get back on solid ground quickly.