Search results

Did Paul? Does God, presuming he wrote through Paul? Do I? I suppose, since I'm handicapped-- placard and all-- and still work. At a family gathering my niece told me about some woman she knows who is-- "if she's handicapped, not very"-- and, comparing her to me, "milks the system"...

As opposed to a communist? I would go with the ideology that has caused less harm to the world and its people.

Yes, it I took a long break with my other pastimes like watching old Marlboro Country commercials.

No, not now; a week or 2 ago.

[Name calling removed] the word is the beginning of a noun clause which does restrict its meaning to those of whom it is predicated. If "anyone" is to be accursed, do you volunteer in order to make your statement correct? (I'm not sure whether to hope so.)

No, are you? For example, Paul said he who does not work shall not eat. Do you proclaim that or something contrary thereto?

Evidently you don't, tw. The word identifies those who are included in the group referred to. So answer my question.

Yes or No: did Paul offend a specific group of people with the citation in question (that is, all who preach a different gospel)?

It would be nice if you had a semblance of a brain. Did the Senate decide that dungpile is another leftist enemy? If so, they considered him.

[Insulting language removed] Any one who is not of the one gospel is cursedcursed. No matter how it is said the meaning is the same.

And your idiocy counters mine? Okay.

So, he says anyone. So can I-- if anyone is not a Christian who believes the bible he is a pile of excrement. It's a charge to know that ain't hate speech.

So why, then, do you add yours?

Nobody needs your idiot repetition. Besides, just the fact that he is one ob would nominate is 'consideration.'

Bunk. Anyone preaching a different gospel having a curse pronounced on them is obviously of a different religion, and would be offended, a concept which makes free speech meaningless ("you can say what you think as long as I'm not offended by it"). [Provocative language removed]

Consider Nixon for that one. He was quite consistent.

Was it hate speech for Paul to say if anyone, including an angel from heaven, preaches a different gospel then let him be accursed?

So they violated the constitution by not researching and evaluating the nom the very minute ob slobbered his name out? That's what I asked before.

Then a time frame for "considering."

Your non-answer indicates there is none. That is sufficient.