Your non-answer indicates there is none. That is sufficient.
-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Supreme Court Nominees
- Thread starter Crabtownboy
- Start date
Your non-answer indicates there is none. That is sufficient.
Zaac
Well-Known Member
A Constitutional time frame for what? If they aren't CONSIDERING, how can there be a time frame?
Then a time frame for "considering."
Zaac
Well-Known Member
The time frame would naturally begin right after a President makes a nomination since they can't advise and consent until one is made. They have unConstitutionally chosen to not consider and not do what the Constitution says they are to do.
They could choose, in their considering to tell the President, that they are rejecting the nominee for whatever reason. But the process set forth by the Constitution demands that nominees be considered.
The Senate does not get to decide that they aren't going to do their jobs for X number of days until the person they want or another President takes office.
So they violated the constitution by not researching and evaluating the nom the very minute ob slobbered his name out? That's what I asked before.
They considered him. His record has been checked and he's a leftist ideologue. Why bother with hearings? His record speaks for itself. "Consider" him toast.
Zaac
Well-Known Member
They violated the Constitutional duties of Senators by choosing to not consider the nominee. The Constitution requires them to advise and consent. They can't advise and consent without considering.
This obstructionist Congress keeps doing stuff like this and then gets their undies in a wad when the man starts taking actions to work around their continued obstruction.
Zaac
Well-Known Member
Yes we all know that your idiot repetition is more than enough for this board.
Nope. You're looking dumber with each statement. HE was nominated by the President. The President has given HIS consideration.
The Senate has not considered anything as they said they would not.
Zaac
Well-Known Member
So why, then, do you add yours?
Zaac
Well-Known Member
Somebody has to counter your idiocy.
Zaac
Well-Known Member
Laugh Shrug.
If you say so.
I say so.X3
And your idiocy counters mine? Okay.
Zaac
Well-Known Member
Your idiocy is in a class of its own to only be countered by the truth to which you have no defense.
Zaac
Well-Known Member
Still haven't countered the truth, huh?
So the non-considering Senate decided to consider now? Just face the fact that you don't know what you're talking about. But that's nothing new.
No, not now; a week or 2 ago.
Are you still playing with that thing?