Search results

Can you explain how "This is my Body" is a metaphor? Matthew 26:26 While they were eating, Jesus took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it and gave it to his disciples, saying, "Take and eat; this is my body." I just read a whole argument against that being a metaphor, Even Martin...

Doesn't Tcass reject dispensationalism as well, or am I wrong?

Now what if someone wrote a paper on preterism? How could it ever be well written and credible to you?

Your random one liners have not convinced me that you can make the claim that you did.

I didn't explain well enough, It wasn't a flip of the switch. It was almost a two year journey of talking to people, reading, ect. But watching the debates is what eased my confusion on the matter.

Watching this mans debates with preterists, is a majority of the reason what drove me to where I stand now.

Can you tell us what your meaning is? I would of failed out of your class a long time ago. Do you actually tell your students that what you say is truth? Or do you present other Ideas that people have as well?

And where do you get that assessment from? What coming is imminent? The second coming? or the "rapture" Plus I dont understand that, If you hold to a complete view of amillennialism, then you believe Jesus's coming is the day of Judgment, No second chance, unlike your view. You could also...

And what a blessing they have been :Wink

Rev 20 7And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison, 8And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together to battle: the number of whom is as the sand of the sea. Who is satan deceiving...

which person on here?

Because we think the white horse is symbolic? Jesus's rightful honor and glory does not depend on him riding a literal white horse. We believe he is sitting on the Throne of David now, Reigning in his kingdom (the Church) Until the day of Judgment. Millennialists are waiting for his reign...

That was just a robycop3 response. I enjoy his replies. Do you know how AT Robertson explained it? If the repetitiveness was clear literalness, why was he so mistaken? When I came on here, I had no position on the Millennium. I always was a PreMill because it was the only thing I have ever...

Im not mocking anything. If he did, [Mockery edited] Its not mockery. You said you have no patience for preterism and do not think to highly of it, but when I said something about the literalness of a verse, i'm mocking it? Yes white horses are very nice, nobody said it wasn't normal.

Albino of course.

For example, The 1000 years, A figure of speech. meaning a literal long period of time, i.e. the present age. all Israel will be saved, Figure of speech, meaning literally, all believers; See you get it. ;)

Saddled or bareback? :D

And Rev 2 26To the one who is victorious and does my will to the end, I will give authority over the nations— 27that one ‘will rule them with an iron scepter and will dash them to pieces like pottery’b —just as I have received authority from my Father.

Yes, I get that, but being Amill, we do not believe the 1000 years is a literal 1000 years But does it make the 1000 actually 1000 years (exactly 999 years plus 1), not just a long period of time.

Yes, but does it have to imply a literal 1000 years?