Search results

the two views are clearly different though.

Only because you and John were insisting on the literalness of the article "The"

But how could he arrive at that position if "The" is means a clear 1000 literal years in Greek. How could anyone interpret allegorical? Wouldn't the article by default make an allegorical interpretation wrong.

How is that an A-Mill view and not a Post Mill view?

This guy was Amillennial? I thought the "THE" in the greek was a clear indiction of literalness of the 1000 years. How can someone with such a knowledge of greek not see the clearness? Im confused.

I actually agree with the ignore thing. I wouldn't ignore you. I laugh at your posts sometimes, and cringe at the repetitiveness, but its entertaining, and actually strengthens my views.

Seriously John, I know, Its mostly my fault for derailing it, by responding to Robycop3. I apologize.

My fault, I type to quick sometimes. Maybe the rouge planet will be the rogue planet.

Now is that after the rogue planet comes to earth to cause plagues? On his white horse, or when he touches down on the mount of olives?

The prince was never the subject, how can the He be the prince?

Must of not been quick enough, 1.1 million Jews died. I think you need to rethink a little.

The rouge planet. :Roflmao:Roflmao:Roflmao:Roflmao:Roflmao:Roflmao

:Roflmao:Roflmao

NO KIDDING. I stated he defended his position later. He is saying some reject the resurrection. Not about the 1000 year reign. Back to the original part, that actually is relevant to the topic. I admitted to you formerly, that I and many others are of this opinion , and [believe] that...

I am saying if it was so clear why would anyone oppose it? He was, he defended his position after this but also said many thought otherwise in his dialog with Trypho. Have you read the dialog?

I know what a figure of speech is. Clearly literal? So know one else knew Greek at all? I admitted to you formerly, that I and many others are of this opinion (temporal 1000 year reign), and [believe] that such will take place, as you assuredly are aware; but, on the other hand, I signified to...

Ecclesiastes 1:4 does the literal earth remain forever? Generations come and generations go, but the earth remains forever. 1. Deu. 1:11 "(The LORD God of your fathers make you a thousand times so many more as ye are, and bless you, as he hath promised you!)" 2. Deu. 7:9 "Know therefore that...

Thank you. This is the the point I was trying to make, Its about the book itself, Not about secular knowledge and technology. I was not arguing when or if it was fulfilled, I was arguing what the "increasing of Knowledge" meant.

Im trying to ask you what you believe it means. and Yeah you probably could. :D

Completely legitimate. Am I not doing the same thing you are with that verse? Whats the face value of Nahum 2:4?