Search results

Thats not what covenanter meant He already clarified what he meant, by giving the passage right after that, to put John's thinking on Trial. Because words mean things, or something like that.

Of Jesus?

Oh my, what a complete twist of words. This is disappointing. Who here denied the Physical Resurrection?

SERIOUSLY? Stop Judging me! IM ASKING QUESTIONS. I was "only using an example with the side talk" I realize he is one person. You take everything I say and make it into something its not.

Explain, how a limited body can be omnipresent.

That makes NO sense. How can a question deny anything? The answer is what would confirm or deny it.

If a Human is limited, and Jesus Is fully human, is Jesus Limited? If God is Omnipresent, and Jesus Is Fully God, Is Jesus Omnipresent?

So if Jesus is 100 percent human, and 100 percent God. Then why is he only limited in the Human side sense. Does he not still have a divine side that is not limited? If he is Physically Limited now, Isn't this giving up divine qualities he possessed before?

1 corinthians 11 17In the following directives I have no praise for you, for your meetings do more harm than good. 18In the first place, I hear that when you come together as a church, there are divisions among you, and to some extent I believe it. 19No doubt there have to be differences among...

2 Corinthians 5:16 16 Therefore, from now on, we regard no one according to the flesh. Even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, yet now we know Him thus no more. and that one? In our resurrected bodies we will retain any wounds we may receive in death "like Christ" did, since...

How do you know what your being taught now is correct? The church used to burn people at the stake, Maybe that is a correct thing to do now as well? This is why Individual interpretation is important.

Never said you did, I was talking about what they were saying to you. I took it for how it was worded, I was mistaken, Sorry. And you know its the RCC how?

Easy now. Im asking questions, nothing else.

Mark 16:12 Afterward Jesus appeared in a different form to two of them while they were walking in the country. 1st John 3:2 Dear friends, now we are children of God, and what we will be has not yet been made known. But we know that when Christ appears, we shall be like him, for we shall see him...

I on the other hand want to learn about it, even if I don't agree, I am very open minded to different ideas, and the why you believe what you do. I do not believe the best way to confront something you don't agree with is by calling it heresy. The only thing I will say about your statement, is...

I've been to Mass before. it's all belief and not actually a transformation correct?. Minus the "miracles" that are recorded if they are even real. Obviously it's still just bread and wine when you eat it. So it's just really in thought the body and blood. You couldn't DNA test the bread.

Well yes from this website POV. I meant it more broad then just this website.

What about the whole Vicar of Christ?

I believe Jesus came in judgment in AD 70, like the passages in the OT. God didn't come literally in them passages either, not physically or in spirt. Its metephorical language about judgment. Mark 16:12 Afterward Jesus appeared in a different form to two of them while they were walking in...

Heretical teaching? Are you serious? On who's authority, I believe futurism is outside the realms of accuracy, So who is making the authority in this? Thats a pretty strong accusation to say its not.