Search results

Bud Adams must be somewhere around 80, right? He was one of the original AFL owners, whose team won the first 2 championships with a revitalized George Blanda at quarterback, beginning the second, and more successful phase of Blanda's career. Maybe from that time on, he has thought he really...

Just so you know, I'm not bothering to read all that.

If Santa is Satan because you can easily rearrange the letters, what does that make God?

Then if you break a bone or have a heart attack Saturday night or Sunday morning, keep it a secret until Monday. Else, EMT's, nurses, residents, technicians, janitors, et al, may be kept from going to church (assuming they might want to).

"Exist?" Yeah, they're spelled out. But if you think they exist as the stone tablets the finger of God wrote (twice), then show them. Or... what are you getting at with "exist?" The same as the New Testament writers proclaimed. We can, but it's optional-- Romans 14:5-6. And no source of...

Not too much during football season.

He hasn't, so far. Now into middle age, I'm beginning to wonder if he's even there to do it.

The dinner bell on Turkey Day— It’s time to eat, so—quick!—let’s pray, Then fill our plate, and up our weight. We’ll spare no fat and spill no sauce. With light or dark meat—one or both— We’ll sense our bellies’ sated growth. And cornbread dressing, what a blessing— Spare no broth and spill...

If I really answered this, you would regret your invitation. But I like tuna casserole (with or without the 'fish' redundancy). I hate the fact that I can't walk without pain... nor without a cane... and that too often I complain. I'm unthankful that we have a holiday on which we make a big...

Well and fine. But the constitution does not use the word or syllable "fire" in this area of concern. I wonder if the Indians and flaming arrows would have been covered there. And if you put stock in how the right was carried out at the time, private seagoing vessels, for example, did carry...

The founding fathers did not define the right to own a firearm, or what kind of arms; they just ratified an amendment saying the people's right to do so will not be infringed.

It would "work," but that's just more 'interpreting' the constitution according to what an era of citizenry thinks it should mean, not exactly what it say. Or, IOW, we do in fact have a government of man, not a government of law.

That's the point here... saying "violate the constitution" as some kind of slur, when there are conditions that the constitutioners could not have envisioned, yet there has never been enough national temperament to amend the applicable part of the document according to its own methods.

Then I will re-ask a question. Was the Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty completely misnamed? But do we go by what the constitution says, or by what a particular era of citizenry thinks it should mean? The beginner of this thread was trying to show that 'conservatives' are willing to violate...

Yes or No: Are nuclear weapons arms? Yes or No: Does the constitution affirm the right to keep and bear arms?

That's noble of you. But you began this thread as an obvious attempt to show that 'conservatives' are willing to violate the constitution for the purpose of safety. Am I correct in presuming that you think you are not willing to do so? If that is the case, when I give my extreme example of an...

Yeah? What does the constitution say about harming innocent people by utilizing your rights it does confirm? Nothing. Yes or No: Are nuclear weapons arms? Yes or No: Does the constitution affirm the right to keep and bear arms?

So you guys do think it should be legal for your next-door neighber to keep an atomic bomb in his basement Is it in the name of safety-- or what?-- that you think the constitution should be violated in this?

Not without more work in the gym. But they are arms, are they not? Or was the Strategic ARMS Limitation Treaty completely misnamed?

So you guys do think it should be legal for your next-door neighber to keep an atomic bomb in his basement?