Search results

That my Brother is depending on if one see this thru Calvinist lens, as I do, or by free will, as Van does

I am still stuck on the fact that anything that we do can bring anything to saving us, as I think its saved by Grace alone received thru Faith alone , and see it as being very "funny" to claim God saw my faith and that is what decided could save me by that faith

They would be basically lost sinners?

Did he have a human soul? And my point before was that He as the Son of God was not eternal that, but he became the Son in the Incarnation , but was still always fully God as the Logos of the Father

So did jesus have a human soul and mind per your understanding then?

Think that God already knew tat would be happening, so had them sealed forever once saved

Think he means those who were saved but due to injury, illness, accident etc are now acting and sounding like they are lost again

Its much more complicated, as must use context, genre, greek construction, grammar etc

He held to heresy, as any saved jew must receive jesus as their messiah and Lord in order to be included in New Covenant, as he held that they could still get saved by that old one still

Heresy of his that held to jews still having a saving OldCovenant relationship wiuth yahweh, but ANY saved jew must accept Jesus same way same Gentiles do to be in the new Covenant

here is the real Christian view on this he hypostatic union is the foundational Christian doctrine that Jesus Christ is one person possessing two distinct natures—fully divine and fully human—united without mixture, change, division, or separation. Established at the Council of Chalcedon (451...

But must be accepted by faith as the revelation from God to us in the Bible

per textual criticsm, the harder reading would sometimes be the preferred reading

The water Baptism of Jesus

Not possible for finite mind to fully comprehend, but that is why needed divine revelation from God, as that view you posted seems to be more akin to Mormomn theology, 3 gods united in common purpose

So which version of the Kjv would be the perfect one, as there have been many revisions, each different form original 1611, and which TR text is pure Greek one?

Which would fit textually what the original probably actually had stated

Jesus the man did not existed until the time of the conception in womb of Mary, but he also had eternally preexisted as Word of the Father, and he became the Son of God at the Incarnation

His response seems to be typical KJVO though

Have you ever seen a perfect English translation that NEVER had to get revised/redited ever since was first translated?