Search results

I see I blundered a bit with my commentary on Luke 10:25. Here is my mistaken statement: Next, notice that this lawyer says, what shall I do, meaning what must I do to acquire an inheritance of eternal life. Under the Old Covenant, salvation was by works, and this is the mindset of the...

In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Genesis 1:1 NASB Was God, the Father or the Son or the Holy Spirit? Nope. Here, God refers to our Triune God. So a more clear and accurate translation might read: In the beginning, our Triune God created the heavens and the earth...

In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Was God, the Father or the Son or the Holy Spirit? Nope. Here, God refers to our Triune God. So a more clear and accurate translation might read: In the beginning, our Triune God created the heavens and the earth.

NOPE!!!!!!!!!!! The topic of this thread is Apollinarianism, not Atonement. When Christ died, He provided the "means of reconciliation" to humanity, and did not reconcile any individual. Following His physical death, on the same day, the believing thief was reconciled, washed in His blood...

1) Name calling is NOT your only bag, as denial is your forte. 2) Next you pretend you do not know a new rendering of an existing translation replaces rather than adds. We have over 60 English translation versions now, and if each one was updated to be more concordant, we would still have...

If we look at Psalms 45:6-7, we see God was anointed by His God. Thus God the Son is forever and ever according to Hebrews 1:8-9.

Recently a well respected poster claimed my Christology was the heresy of Apollinarianism. I claimed it was not. I never acknowledged the poster was correct, because I did not, and the poster, as far as I know, never acknowledged I was right, either. This failure to reach consensus is the bane...

In an old and problematic scheme of things, it does not matter whether the gospel is presented accurately or not, no human being is able to respond to it appropriately anyway, because everyone in their natural fallen state suffers from total spiritual inability. Then, again according to the...

1) The poster is a troll. Note this is not a personal attack it is an observation. Fiddlesticks. 2) Claiming we need "more" translations misrepresents the fact we need our translations to be more concordant. 3) We need our translations to be more clear and accurate, and we need bible...

You take about me like a gossip, rather than address the topic. If you are unable to offer suggestions for improving our translations, why post? Has the godless left taken control, using false charges and cancel culture to intimidate those seeking to help the lost gain understanding of...

You are still posting off topic. And still posting falsehoods, as we should all strive for more accurate and clear translations of God's word. Do you not know if we study from more accurate translations, our understanding will be more accurate?

In Luke 10:25-37, Jesus tells the story of the Samaritan. In the story, the Samaritan is never referred to a Good. This descriptive term has been added by those who have studied the story from an eternal perspective. Let go over the story and see if adding Good is a good thing. Many of us...

1) False, you misrepresented my view (we do not need more translation versions) which is a personal attack. 2) Our English translations are neither as clear as they could be, nor as accurate as they could be. 3) The thread is based on the concept the translators should be more consistent in...

You take about me like a gossip, rather than address the topic. If you are unable to offer suggestions for improving our translations, why post? Has the godless left taken control, using false charges and cancel culture to intimidate those seeking to help the lost gain understanding of...

This troll continues to address me and not the thread topic. Nuff said. We need more that to study our translation objectively, we need clear and accurate translations of the inspired word. 1) Luke 2:15 NASB "see this "thing" 2) CSB "see "what" has happened" 3) DRA " "see this "word" that" 4)...

Canadyd seems to have no idea of how to use an Exhaustive Concordance, and seems clueless as to how to improve our translations. I say improve the existing translations and the troll suggests I said we need more translation versions. Fiddlesticks. We need more that to study our translation...

Sir, you have revealed your character, candor and integrity. Goodbye. Folks, Jesus the man was not created with a human spirit/soul. His fully human mind was the product of his physical brain intertwined with His divine Spirit, as altered to become in the likeness of our human mind.

If you do NOT know which is inspired, nothing I can say will help.

No answer! You constantly misrepresent me but avoid stating your view. Fiddlesticks. One spirit or two! Such a simple question.

You forgot to say what point you were trying to make. If the inspired text says "death" and the non-inspired text says "Hades" you should stick with death!