Search results

Note the clear sequence of actions, first a person receives Him, refers to those who believe in His name. Thus the first action is lost person comes to put their faith, as worthless as it may be, in what he or she believes about Christ, such as Jesus is God incarnate, born of a virgin, lived a...

On and on this poster continues to post falsehoods already shown to be his own misrepresentations, just like Satan in the garden. Next he claims God would credit a person's faith as righteousness that does not meet God's purpose. Idiotic gibberish. On and on, one false claim after another...

Yet another vile misrepresentation, just like Satan. Did I say God is desperately trying to save every person? Nope. I referenced 1 Timothy 2:4-6 which says: who wants all people to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth. For...

Yet another vile misrepresentation, just like Satan. Did I say "your righteousness?" Nope, so a false claim by a falsehood poster. I said God credits the person's faith as righteousness. Does anyone believe this poster actually did not grasp that having a right belief does not make a...

God desires all people to be saved according to His redemption plan, not Calvinism's compulsion plan. Thus Christ's death was a ransom for all, those to be saved and those never to be saved. Christ became the means of reconciliation for the whole of humanity. Since Christ provided the means...

The issue is not the true gospel, but whether God credits an imperfect understanding of that gospel if it meets His purpose. Your thread says no, which is an obscene, my way or the highway claim. What does Matthew 23:13 say? That people who were in the process of entering the kingdom were...

Folks, please re-read John Chapter 21. Note how Peter does not love Jesus sacrificially (Greek agapao) but does love Jesus relationally (phileo). Jesus accepts this immature commitment as meeting His purpose. Calvinism's claims are false, unbiblical, and obscene. They deny Christ died as a...

The issue is not the true gospel, but whether God credits an imperfect understanding of that gospel if it meets His purpose. Your thread says no, which is an obscene, my way or the highway claim. This thread violates the basic tenets of the forum.

This obscene thread is a "my way or the highway" thread. Only those given a perfect faith, instilled by God, which is the Calvinist view, are saved, all others, believing Calvinism is mistaken, are unsaved. This thread violates the basic tenets of the forum.

Again, I asked for the Father's basis for transferring an individual into Christ, and this poster changes the subject. These posters are enemies of the truth. Here is is contended that the meaning of John's phrase, originally written in Greek, does not mean, when literally translated into...

Why is it that Calvinists cannot address what scripture says, but must misrepresent the biblical presentations I post? Does God justify a sinner based of their righteousness? Nope. What I actually said: Believing Into Christ based on God (the Father) crediting your faith as righteousness is...

John 1:12-13 NASB But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, to those who believe in His name, who were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of a man, but of God. Here is my interpretation: "As many as received Him"...

God allows humans to make choices that could alter the outcome of their lives, such as believing into Christ or not.

Yet more gibberish, believing John referred to positional sanctification when he used the inspired phrase believes into Him, is believing the bible. I asked for the basis of the Father's action, and you deflected.

Yet another Calvinist who has deleted Romans Chapter 4 from his bible.

God causes, ordains, predestines OR allows whatsoever comes to pass. God does not just cause, ordain or predestine whatsoever comes to pass. Exhaustive Determinism is unbiblical nonsense. Scripture teaches things happen by chance necessitating the allowance of chance occurrence.

More gibberish, more demonstration the poster just wants to obfuscate. In his deflection does he say what the Father does, or provide the basis for the Father's action? Believing Into Christ based on God (the Father) crediting your faith as righteousness is truth

I cannot believe these posters of obfuscation actually do not want truth to prevail! Believing Into Christ based on God crediting your faith as righteousness is truth. Removing God crediting the person faith as righteousness from the gospel does not allow truth to prevail.

So you admit you were deflecting, and not answering the question concerning the issue under discussion?

Obviously, this poster wants to pretend he cannot grasp the issue. Did he say who decides that a person believes such that they are transferred into Christ. Nope. Instead we get the usual stonewalling gibberish of an empty suit.