Search results

Would not urprise me that someone of that thinking actually did, and would call it the angelic tongues revision

Even though I hold to Reformed Baptist theology, there is a tactful way to discuss things in a cicil manner, and it cuts both ways, as I liked Dr MacArthur, but at times he came off shrill towards those who he disagreed with his views in theology, see Charismatic Chaos, as I also see Charasmatic...

Any who were saved by the grace of God are my sister/brother in Christ, buit would say that there are some pretty significant differences in some theological areas

Well, early on in the Pentecostal Movement , there were times when they looked upon the gift of tongues as a way to evangelize to other people without even needing to learn their language, as the Spirit Himself would give them that needed tongue, so maybe they applied that towards translation also?

Works great for translations also, as must look at context and genre involved

That is why translation would be so tedious a work, as iys much more involved then just looking up the Greek word used and just find a comparable English word to match

regenerated unto salvation

We believe in what Jesus stated, that they believed and loved him due to the truth that he loved them first

And soon after that His Systematic theology

Any who states that they do not know at all Greek Grammar should not be going on about translation issues

I have also asked him what his qualifications are to be judging just how accurate and faithful to the Hebrew and greek texts a Translation is, but so far no response back

God is never changing in his essense of Deity, but adding the human nature and becoming human flesh did not change Deity, but added humanity now

Think what many object to most would be the pretrib view of premil eschatology

I also take prophecy literal, but do also see how the scriptures do support other viewpoints

None ever called any translation as being inspired and perfect until the KJVO arose

We cn trust it as being an infallible witness to the Hebrew and Greek word of God, but cannot call it perfect nor inspired

An there will be instances in the texts that has some ambiguity still remaining, as there are legit reasons one can transform that section in one way or another way, is it the faith of jesus or is it in jesus per example?

God NEVER has inspired ANY translation, as Hhe ONLY did that for the Hebrew and Greek originals

he did "add" human nature

It goes all back to when any of us think that we now have Apostolic theology understanding, that we feel that we can state with certainity that if you are a Calvinist, or a non calvinist, or a Dispy or a CT, or hold to this mode pf baptist, etc that all with yoiur view are great, but those...