Search results

I respect their efforts to get the bible out to all people, but just wish they were not so dogmatic KJVO

I do have the book that he co authored about Puritan theology for today, and am interested in getting his brand new essentials of theology book, where he ha=s condensed down his 4 volume systematic theology

I was applying that towards those who hold to KJVO

What is interesting is that the "Baptist translation" the HCSB, was originally to be a new translation made off the Greek Majority text, but think the editor ofthe text passed away, and was then switched to the critical Greek text Mark ward was for years a staunch KJVO, but not supports various...

And was not to be seen as granting approval to those who twist it to get their blab it and grab it theology

Many more times though have had funerals when the Christian died in christ, yet kept their testimony for the Lord Jesus even despite not getting healed, but was healed right after they died

Ask the Apostles what it cost them to obey and follow Jesus, as they were not experiencing the so called glamourous lifestyle promised in the modern Charasmatic Chaos movement

Signs and wonders seem to be used today by the Holy Spirit to reach and impact Muslims , but that would be due to unquique circumstances, as in closed off until now nations and peoples, not the norm

Indeed, as jesus was stuck in his flesh body and could just walk around at that time, but now he has MANY of his "foot soldiers" to get the good news of Him out to entire world

Sign gifts to the Apostles were distinct and not repeated by the Holy Spirit

Good point, but still odd that those holding to TR is only greek text would deny as being legit kjv Nkjv, Kjv 2021, MEV, as all of them used same textual sources as kjv team

One can be a KJVP, but no way should be used based upon textual criticism and biblical references concerning what inspiration really means

And when we point out to them many in our group actually do use esv and Nas

The High priest Himself placed hands upon the lamb and "placed the sins" of the people of Israel on it, is that not a clear picture of what was to happen ehen the true Lamb of God came?

From the very start in Genesis, someone had to have their blood shed to 'cover up Adam and Eve", and the Ot sacrifical system clearly outlined to us how the coming suffering Messiah would be the sin bearer and atoner for His own people

We have so saving faith inherit within us, as that itself would be a gift of God towards us

Seems to be the Bible perspective that those who will do great things for the Lord also will suffer and endure great hardships many times

No, rather it means that no translation would be inerrant and perfect

Think Dr beeke pastors a large Reformed church right here in Michigan, and he is indeed a good writer and scholar, disagree with him on Amil and Infant Baptism, but hey, none of us have perfect theology

Strange that the 1611 translators themselves NEVER saw their 1611 kjv as a perfect and finished work, as they expected in the future others would come along and improve and build upon their translation efforts