Search results

Is that a straw man diversion? I have nowhere claimed that lies are inspired. The false claims made by KJV-only advocates are not inspired.

According to the Scriptures themselves, it could be soundly concluded that inspiration would be a term for the way, method, means, or process by which God directly gave the Scriptures to the prophets and apostles or for the way that the words proceeded from the mouth of God to the prophets and...

In his new 2025 book entitled THE TEXT OF THE KING JAMES BIBLE, KJV defender Laurence Vance wrote: "Modern King James Bibles have not been updated directly from the 1611 Authorized Version" (p. 181). KJV defender Laurence Vance wrote: "There are 750 differences between the 1769 Blayney edition...

Today's varying post-1900 KJV editions are not the 1769 Oxford KJV edition. As many as 400 more changes and corrections were made to the 1769 Oxford KJV edition in a typical post-1900 KJV edition. In 2017, a reprint edition of the 1769 Oxford folio edition was made available by The Bible...

In his introduction to his 1833 revision of the KJV, Noah Webster claimed: “There are many passages in which the [KJV] translators have inserted and improperly, between clauses, which are in apposition, and ought not to be made distinct. In 1 Corinthians 4:13, the words and are give a sense not...

The King James Version is a version or translation of the preserved Scriptures in the original languages. In his glossary, William Grady defined version as “the translation of a literary composition from its original tongue into a second language” (Final Authority, p. 330). To claim that the...

www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/shocking-government-report-reveals-national-debt-crisis-grew-much-worse-under-biden/ar-AA1zlDy9?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=211a60e68bf6406bfb2daaa8e7a302ad&ei=19

The 1611 edition of the KJV was and is not always right since it needed several corrections. The 1769 Oxford edition of the KJV is not always right since it had over 100 errors. You fail to prove your opinion that the KJV is always right to be true.

www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/alarming-report-shows-us-drowning-in-red-ink-as-democrats-block-spending-cuts/ar-AA1z9ecx?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=903c02bda91c493ea7c0409aa97ec2a6&ei=53

There seems to be a great deal of deceit concerning the Scriptures among KJV-only advocates who have deceived themselves or who have been deceived by others into believing exclusive only claims for the KJV that are not true and scriptural. According to a just application of scriptural truths...

What is one Biblical principle that would apply to Bible translation and its purpose? "And how hear we every man in our tongue, wherein we were born?" (Acts 2:8). "So likewise ye, except ye utter by the tongue words easy to be understood, how shall it be known what is spoken? for ye shall speak...

I have seen more than 4 variations in KJV editions at Matthew 4:2. Matthew 4:2 [see Matt. 12:1, 21:18, 25:42; Luke 4:2] [was afterward hungrie--1560 Geneva] afterward was hungry (1824 Boothroyd) was afterwards hungry (1784 Piguenit) (1842 Bernard) afterward He was hungry (2023 Sayers) was...

www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/expert-reveals-massive-levels-of-waste-doge-can-slash-from-entitlements-pet-projects-a-lot-of-fat/ar-AA1z3uWZ?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=400e013401194350a98a635f7e3b0c6d&ei=27

The originals were given and written by a miracle of inspiration of God while the KJV was not made by any direct miracle of inspiration. According to what the KJV itself teaches, the term inspiration would concern the giving of all Scripture to the prophets and apostles, not any post-NT...

The varying English text of many different editions of the KJV is the work of one exclusive group of Church of England scholars--the same scholars who made its marginal notes. When you believe the English text of the KJV, you may be believing the scholars who made it over the preserved...

Here is an example that demonstrates that the Malcolm Watts' and D. A. Waite's accusations against the NKJV are not reliable. In the KJV-only view’s pure stream of Bible, there is a slight difference in rendering at this verse between the pre-1611 English Bibles and the 1611 KJV. At 2 Samuel...

You can believe your human non-scriptural opinion, but that does not make it true. You may be deceiving yourself by believing non-true opinions concerning the KJV. The KJV itself teaches again believing that words added by men [which would include many words added by the KJV translators] are...

You are still misinformed. Erasmus used a printed edition of Jerome's Latin Vulgate. Are you appealing to a post-Erasmus Greek manuscript that was made from copying the printed editions?

You ignore the fact that the 1611 edition and other 1600's editions of the KJV had a comma after God at 2 Peter 1:1 and Titus 2:13. The 1611 edition of the KJV has a comma after God at 2 Peter 1:1 [God, and our Saviour Jesus Christ], and that comma seems to have remained in most KJV editions...

www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/how-democrats-were-tricked-into-believing-the-economy-was-strong/ar-AA1yPSVu?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=f05c30a5db3f44cdb6707924c206a18f&ei=17