Search results

Biased KJV-only sources are unreliable on this matter. There is not compelling evidence that overrules the firsthand statements of Erasmus himself.

Will you practice what you preach in this example? Another way that Gail Riplinger asserted that the built-in definition can be found will be considered. Gail Riplinger maintained that one of the ways to find the built-in definition was to “look for parallellism” (Language of the KJB, p. 25)...

Surprisingly, the 1611 edition of the KJV has a comma after God at 2 Peter 1:1 [God, and our Saviour Jesus Christ], and that comma seems to have remained in most KJV editions printed up to the 1769 Oxford edition. The 1743 Cambridge and 1760 Cambridge editions had actually removed it before the...

Do you practice what you preach and accept the possible built-in definition for the KJV’s rendering “mansions” at John 14:2? Gail Riplinger asserted: “The definition may be somewhere in the chapter” (In Awe, p. 49). Referring to use of Strong’s Concordance, Gail Riplinger wrote: “Within the...

You may have been misinformed by Gail Riplinger's unproven claim that the KJV defines all its words or by the claim of someone who repeats Riplinger's human opinion. Perhaps Gail Riplinger herself may have later realized that she had claimed and suggested too much in asserting that the KJV has...

You are wrong. You are contradicting what Erasmus himself wrote in his own notes. Erasmus is known to have had only one Greek NT manuscript for the book of Revelation, and it was one that was missing the last six verses of the book of Revelation. You are ignoring what Erasmus himself stated...

You contradict Erasmus himself since he admitted translating those last six verses from the Latin. Have you read Erasmus' hand-written notes concerning those verses? John Nordstrom maintained that Erasmus acknowledged in his annotations that he had translated the last six verses of Revelation...

Perhaps you have been misinformed. You do not prove your assertions to be true. The NKJV is not translated from the Critical Text as the RSV was. The NKJV is not basically the same principle as the RSV. It has not been proven that the makers of the NKJV consulted the RSV in any of their...

www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/david-marcus-liberal-media-s-lies-to-protect-biden-were-even-worse-than-you-think/ar-AA1yh4jT?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=639293f703b5484b9e1b9d6e5ffd9ce4&ei=21

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/how-us-taxpayers-funded-the-largest-illegal-migration-in-history/ar-AA1yelgQ?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=d92b7c8780ab4817a9d8baa765b80874&ei=24...

You fail to demonstrate that you know and tell the truth about Bible translations. According to your posts, you may believe non-true and non-scriptural KJV-only opinions concerning the KJV. The word of God is not bound to the textual criticism decisions, Bible revision decisions, and...

The King James Version is a version or translation in the same sense (univocally) as the pre-1611 English Bibles are translations. Your belief concerning the KJV does not change what it actually is. A Bible translation is not free from all causes and independent of all sources and...