Search results

I’m just going by what was stated by someone you think supports you, but it fact, denies the very claims you’re making.

Words added into a text from Africa from Latin isn’t preserved no matter how much you spin it.

It’s this way with KJVO’ers. They do things but when we do them it’s a “no no”.

F.H.A. Scrivener: “Even several impressions derived from the same standard edition, and professing to exhibit a text positively the same, differ from their archetype and from each other, in errors of the press which no amount of care or diligence has yet been able to get rid of.” A Plain...

Jakob van Bruggen: “Pleading for the return to the known Church text certainly does not mean that this textus receptus must be canonized.” The Ancient Text of the New Testament “The textus receptus should not be rejected categorically because of its shortcomings, but should according to its...

From Wilbur N. Pickering: “The whole of chap. 7 (in my book) is given to a presentation of how I propose to determine the identity of the text, and on p. 177 I plainly state that the TR will probably require correction in over a thousand places.” The Identity of the New Testament Text pg. 177...

From Dean Burgon: “We do not, by any means, claim perfection for the Received Text. We entertain no extravagant notions on this subject. Again and again we shall have occasion to point out (e.g. at page 107) that the Textus Receptus needs correction.” The Revised Revise pg 21 footnote 2/3...

Here is Pickering's quote about the Johannine Comma and it not being part of the original text: Footnote about 1 John 5:7 from Pickering‘s Family 35: Those who use the AV or NKJV are used to: “There are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these...

Here:

Seeing I don't have access to those quotes online, I resorted to where I could find the quotes provided via ChatGPT.

Those were their quotes supplied by ChatGPT. Nothing that refutes your position will suffice. Its what we call here in the country, "shuck-and-jive".

Please answer my question.

From me: Quotes from Burgon, Scrivener, Pickering, or van Bruggen, where they stated the Textus Receptus was not free from errors? ChatGPT: Did Burgon, Scrivener, Pickering, or van Bruggen Believe the Textus Receptus Was Perfect? A common assumption is that defenders of the Textus Receptus...

This is the THIRD TIME I have asked you to show me where you addressed this? I cannot find it and hope you will provide a link to the post where you did. TIA

He denied the validity of Johannine Comma being in the originals.

Directly from Family 35: ὅτι τρεῖς εἰσιν οἱ μαρτυροῦντες "--- ὃτὸ Πνεῦμά καὶ τὸ ὕδωρ καὶ τὸ αἷμα--καὶ οἱ τρεῖς εἰς τὸ ἕν εἰσιν. The Johannine Comma is absent.

Footnote about 1 John 5:7 from Pickering‘s Family 35: Those who use the AV or NKJV are used to: “There are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one. And there are three that bear witness on earth: the Spirit, the water, and the blood...

@Conan @Anthony Pritchard My question to ChatGPT: “Find the actual Pickering page where 1 John 5:7 is printed in his Greek New Testament According to Family 35” chatGPT: Yes. I found the actual Pickering material, and it gives us something better than simply saying that he omitted the Comma...

Where? Link to that post where you addressed it? I seriously cannot find where you did. TIA

Care to point me to where you did? I cannot find it. TIA