Search results

Why was I dragged into this? If there is a joke in this, it went "wooosh!!" over my head.

But their absence from some [many in some cases?] should send up red flags.

None of this is remotely true. The newer versions use mss that didn’t omit passages but were not there to begin with. I’d venture to guess the KJV is littered with scribal notes, and that’s why they have vss in them that the newer versions bracket and explain they were not found in earlier mss.

It’s not like I’m going rouge but addressing the content of his posts. Like I told him earlier, threads ebb and flow but tend to drift back to the topic of the thread.

With all due respect, I don’t think you have the authority to dictate what we can and cannot post in any thread. If you make a post, we will post what we think is relevant to your post.

He can shuck and jive but weren’t not allowed to. #DoubleStandard

Fobbed? Speak English, man, English!!! Oh, wait....

AP posted: This is KJVO talk in a nutshell. KJVO'ers say the King James Bible (its always Bible with them, when it is really the King James VERSION of the bible), and AP continually calls it the King James Bible. He's KJVO whether he admits it or not. His language betrays him.

This is the THIRD TIME I've said the KJV was not too difficult. Now, do not disparage the modern versions again and I won't go off on a tangent, okay?

I said the KJV was not too difficult, but I will not stand by and let ppl disparage the bibles that use the CT, either. Great men of God spent a lot of time compiling those great modern versions. Do not disparage them and I won't go off on a tangent. And plus, it was you who caused me to go off...

And praytell why the TR is superior? Upon what basis can you claim its superiority?

They pulled "Lucifer" from the Vulgate, and we see the confusion that came from that faux pas.

Tough! She'd had to struggle to read the 17th century Elizabethan language, as the NIV is corrupted. :rolleyes: Confused

FYI, I clearly stated that I did not say you were KJVO, only the language you use is along the same line of reasoning they used. I don't buy the superiority of the TR/Byzantine. And besides, there are no key doctrines affected by this CT vs RT debate.

Yesireebob!!!

Are you TRO?

However, the language you are using seems to appear you are KJVO. I am not accusing you of holding that position while refuting it as well, but your language seems to speak like those who are KJVO.

Threads ebb and flow but eventually get back on topic. My point is this; if the KJV is the standard or perfect [I am not saying you are advocating either/both, just making my point], then I am right there with you. But since it is neither, then no one should be afraid of the other mainstream...

That is why having different versions at your disposal is more beneficial than relying on just one.

Well, I do care about the higher prices. And no, voting Communist/Socialist isn't the answer either. But Trump has taken a massive "L" here.